Originally Posted by nihil
1. Can anybody explain the relationship between "trademark enfringement" and defamation?
2. Can anyone explain how an IP address (that actually belongs to the ISP) in any way proves who actually used it (assuming, of course, that it wasn't spoofed)? Particularly in a civil lawsuit?
3. What the hell kind of legal system requires the defendant in a civil lawsuit provide information to support the case of the plaintiff?
4. I can only comment for relative civilisation, but it works like this: scumbag threatens to sue and I ignore............... I could give more details but really, I can't be bothered. The basic rule is that if you are "clean" you don't do anything until a properly appointed court tells you that you have a case to answer. Otherwise you will not be able to recover your legal costs.
5. Ah! it is breakfast time over here, and I can smell the kippers frying.......... well something fishy anyway?
:confused:
EDIT:
Undies~ makes some good points in the above post.
This bit is very important:
That is a very interesting use of the future tense?
It implies that they do not already have this evidence? That doesn't surprise me, because they would have to pay the ISP anything that they chose to charge, this being a civil matter.
But, they seem to be able to predict the future?............... which implies planting evidence and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. That takes us into the realm of felony offenses and free legal advice? :cool:
Try your local District Attorney and the FBI for some free advice.
Be sure that you are as pure as the driven snow, because once you unleash the forces of darkness there is no stopping them.
Do not let anyone near your records or equipment and make sure that all communications are in writing, and that alone, and certainly NOT e-mails..
By the way, what exactly was the "defamatory information"?