'Child porn', even surfing can mean jail...

Guys,

This is fuc**ng important!!! and i hope you don't be one of these motherfu***rs!!!

Quote:

---

But he warned anyone tempted to access child pornography online that even if you delete images and Internet page addresses from the computer's hard drive, police can still retrieve them, as they did with a PC belonging to pop star Gary Glitter, who was jailed for four months in 1999 for possessing child pornography. "Once you look at a picture of child pornography, that counts as possession which is punishable by jail," Robbins told CNN...

---

Source and full story here

Opinions?

Bye.

DKRR

Yeah, I've got one. Porn sucks, therefor childporn sucks more. If the police discover you have a sick mind and enjoy looking at unclothed kids, you deserve it.


Regards,
Silentstalker

very good that sick weirdos get jail time for doing that. im still confused a bit on how the cops retrieve them unless they just read the ips and get the amt of pics requested or whatever from the site's cache? dunno, tis a good cause however they do it.

Ah! Computer Forensics :) Well, if I were them I'd hire a hacker to penetrate that site, and retrieve all IP addresses recently connected to them on port 80. It would be a simple way to get all the offenders. Don't you think?


Regards,
Silentstalker

If you look at kiddie porn you deserve what you get for being the sick, reprehensible pervert that you really are. There is NO valid argument for the existence of kiddie porn...PERIOD. If you are a "legitmate" (I use that term loosly ;) ) porn surfer and you come across a site that offers kiddie porn then you should do the responsible thing and report it.....would you want your kids exploited in such a manner? I feel sorry for Pete Townsend and think that his case may be too extreme....I fail to see a pattern of pedophilia there. But again, he wouldn't be having this problem if he had done the right thing in the first place.

Rant over, and I'm sorry if I came off harsh, but being a parent has that effect sometimes...

Yeah, if police have reason to believe you have been surfing child pr0n, they can run some hard drive forensic tools and recover the pictures even if you deleted them. Also, if they subpena the web site or server in question and grab all the IP's that have been hitting the web site can track you back to your ISP and demand your information.

There is a lot police and the feds can do if they are watching you... and for all you pervs out there, they are :)

albn

Harsh is not negative in this sense, in my opinion. I feel that in the case of a site exploiting nude minors, harsh is the only way you must be. I mean, if I ever came across such a site, I wouldn't not report them because I would feel bad for the soon-to-be-jailed lamers that made that site... but that's just me.


Regards,
Silentstalker

Remember your computer has a cache area no matter what OS

I would use http://www.theabsolute.net/sware/
There is a Clean Disk Security utility there


I get so much spam on several of my accounts you
never know what is there.... and I use them as my main
contact areas so even using www.spampal.us

With what happen in the UK you never know...

Personally I think users of Kiddy Porn are SICK!!!
and need our help to put them away where they
will not hurt anyone.

Does kiddie porn refer to any porn of someone under 18 years old? Or somewhat younger children

Children are children and shouldnt be used OR viewed in porn, and according to UK's law....they just have to "seem" to be children, guess that means that they dont have to prove thier age to charge you
They should just take the sights off the net period, if they have the means to track people that visit them, they have the means to get the site owners and the sicko's that actually produce the porn.

Im going to have to agree with the majority on this one. You have to be one screwed up perverted motherfu***r to view Child porn, and if you do get jailed you deserve it. To top it off if i ever come across a child porn site ill contact whoever is necessary to get the site removed from whatever webhosting company is hosting it.

Quote:

---

Originally posted here by allenb1963
If you look at kiddie porn you deserve what you get for being the sick, reprehensible pervert that you really are. There is NO valid argument for the existence of kiddie porn...PERIOD. If you are a "legitmate" (I use that term loosly ;) ) porn surfer and you come across a site that offers kiddie porn then you should do the responsible thing and report it.....would you want your kids exploited in such a manner? I feel sorry for Pete Townsend and think that his case may be too extreme....I fail to see a pattern of pedophilia there. But again, he wouldn't be having this problem if he had done the right thing in the first place.

Rant over, and I'm sorry if I came off harsh, but being a parent has that effect sometimes...

---

arent you the pervert though Al? hahahahahahahhahahahahahhaha remember that.... so sad... so wrong... hahahahahhahaha

/me digs up the decayed body of "phreek18" and uses it to bludgeon er0k into unconciousness.....


LOL...it's all good man......quick thinking resulting in sharp humor, a trait to be proud of!

In Norway there was a big kiddy-porn razzia in 2002. They chaught thousands of kiddy-porn surfers....SICK! The world is going bananas... I agree with all of you thinking that the twisted minds that acctually enjoys looking at undressed kids deserve jail.

hey, what happens if it was an accident? i have occasionaly tryed a website without any profanities and when i typed it in the address bar it comes up with alsorts of unwanted sites. and what about peer to peer pragrams. is it possible to see whats being transfered to your computer when its not directly off the net?? just a thought

Trust Not 123 - If its an accident - its an accident you will be excused at law.

If you return to the site time and time again and pay to get access to the stuff inside, you can safely rule that defence out !!!! as for the UK celebrity, I am sorry, I have no sympathy for him in light of recent news reports I heard. "Research" - bollocks - his only hope is that his jury is as gullible as he is.

If you deliberately access this stuff you deserve what is coming to you, a long holiday in the "Lonely Hearts Hotel" with a 20-stone room-mate called Bubba.

first off I agree with most opinions here... surfers for child pr0n are sick... and well.. they should have their balls cut off and rammed down their throats.

But I have a (slightly) off topic question pertinent to this area. Supposing said surfer of child pr0n is using a RAM disk to save temp internet files, cookies, index.dat etc to. These files never get saved to HD thus once the computer is rebooted RAM gets wiped out and so do all your cookies, temp internet files and index.dat. Correct me if I'm wrong but you can't recover files stored only in RAM once the RAM has been reset... can you? So if said child pr0n surfer stored said files in RAM... other than looking at things like IP records, VISA card purchases etc... is there any way you'd be able to prove they had looked at child pr0n... they wouldn't have any sus files on the HD..... (unless the abscence of index.dat etc from HD is in itself suspicious).... or am I missing something? Any thoughts?

Z

Guys,

Thanks for your answers!!!

I just want to tell you that it seems that (although my bar is now positive in post #1) i received a negging message (please, this is not about APs), is just to say that someone seems not to agree with us. and to THIS hidden person, i just HOPE and PREFER you have neged my by a personal problem with me (although from my part i don't have problems with any person here) and not because you are in favor of child porn... i just hope you don't like child porn. :mad: One more thing, about my language, i wrote *** between the "bad" words so it's OK this way, every one use this, and fuc**ng is not a "bad" word, it depends how you use it.

Thanks.

Bye.

Quote:

---

Originally posted here by Suberme
Does kiddie porn refer to any porn of someone under 18 years old? Or somewhat younger children

---

This actually depends on several factors. First and most important, is what country you are accessing the pictures in. In the USA and Canada, 18 is the age, but it is much younger in Europe. Also, you will not be charged if the models are underage but claim to be 18 (although not if they're obviously far younger!), as the law cannot expect you to know, so you don't have to worry on that score (I've heard stories of people getting in trouble for these (Barely Legal sites you e-mail is always helpfully informing you of, but never of actually being found guilty once the facts are realized).
Third, "kiddie porn" is roughly defined as children performing sexual acts. Simply looking at pictures of nude children, such as pictures of nudist families, or pictures of your own children (many people have pictures of their children nude, playing in sprinklers and such, and some tend to post them up on their website, not thinking) are not illegal, although it is up to a judge to decide what is proper or not.
Finally, there is some discussion as to whether "fake kiddie porn", digitally altered pictures made to look like "hardcore" child pornography are illegal, as there is no formal law about them yet in most countries. Once again, this is mostly a judge's decision, and if a case were to come up with these, it would probably have to be decided by a very high authority, and a permanent law created.

I hope this answers your question far more than you needed it answered ;)

SSJVegeta-Sei