I noticed that their news was copied from the Antionline headlines also. I hope that this helps people realise that when you get contacted by this *group* not to take it seriously.
Printable View
I noticed that their news was copied from the Antionline headlines also. I hope that this helps people realise that when you get contacted by this *group* not to take it seriously.
no offence man, but that was a rhetorical question...not a serious one. i was pointing out their flaws by letting you figure it out :-PQuote:
Originally posted by stflook
Simple. They're computer-illiterate posers who think they can hack because they can download script kiddie programs. I know that sounds harsh, but I challenge somebody to prove me otherwise.
ya know, mabee itd be more apropriate to call them 'Net-Farce'
I know. It's just that I'm still a little mad at that little parasite s0rcerer running around threatening to hack me. He couldn't even get my IP. He was discovered for what he was - a worthless, immature little script kiddie (at best), and knows it. Yet he's still dumb enough to keep pulling this crap. I used to tell people to leave him alone because he's unstable, VERY annoying, and not worth their time. Now I say do whatever you want because the little turd's harmless, and great for a laugh.Quote:
Originally posted by 8*B@LL
no offence man, but that was a rhetorical question...not a serious one. i was pointing out their flaws by letting you figure it out :-P
Yeah, they've got issues... they have a page on a free hosting service, yet their founder is entitled "CEO"...
They have a ton of 'affiliates', but I wonder if there is a legal definition for that. I'm darn-tootin-sure their 'affiliates' don't even know they are being claimed as affiliates... Maybe I'll send some "FYI" mails to that extent...
lol...sombody should drop cDc a little note telling them they are listed on the site...then we could just sit back and watch the show...heh
[added]
i droped a note in the cDc feedback. i wonder how this will play out.
You should. Then we can all sit back and watch the fireworks. I'll bring the matches!Quote:
Originally posted by Terr
Yeah, they've got issues... they have a page on a free hosting service, yet their founder is entitled "CEO"...
They have a ton of 'affiliates', but I wonder if there is a legal definition for that. I'm darn-tootin-sure their 'affiliates' don't even know they are being claimed as affiliates... Maybe I'll send some "FYI" mails to that extent...
sorry, don't like icq, never have.
-havanger
Unfortunately, an "Affiliate" is a very greasy and undefined definiton from a legal sense. It strongly implies reciprocity, mutual affiliate-ism, but I don't think you could sue someone for claiming you were an affailiate of theirs.Quote:
Originally posted by stflook
You should. Then we can all sit back and watch the fireworks. I'll bring the matches!
I doubt you could be sued for claiming to be an affialate either, anyway 'cdc' would probably just laugh if they saw this site, nobody surely believes they really are affialates.