Re: Is AVG better than Norton?
I myself have tested AVG 6.0 vs Norton and have ran into a situation (more than once) where AVG has missed viruses that Norton has found
I dont know whether u r wrong or not and i also saw the links u provided but i myself used Norton Antivirus 2004 and also AVG 6.0 but what i found was that both of them(one at time) were not able to make my box virus-free although my virus definitions were up-to-date so no chance of obselete data. than i went on searching on google.com and i found PANDA ANTIVIRUS PLATINUM SECURITY 8.00( i m sorry i dont remember the link as it was sometime back) and wow, it proved to be a boom to me, it not only removed all the viruses from my PC but also made it faster! and now i can browse any part of the internet without worrying for the viruses!!! it also provides a firewall which is compatible to the Windows XP Service Pack 2 firewall and together they make a fabulous combo!! thats my piece of experience and if u ask me i'll seriously recommend Panda AV!!! dont take me wrong but do tell me if something opposite happened or Norton AV 2004 have now became more efficient and is now able to perform better than others as i'll then get that thing into action.... u dont want to keep a expensive thing u bought just like a piece of junk! do u?