Search:

I guess I'm old but I never heard of that saying. You don't have to be one, but it help's to atleast possess the knowledge that a hacker would.

The Grunt: Piggy Backing is that -- catching a free ride. By that meaning no work involved which leads the skiddies to Piggy Back. It basically means they are using others code and exploits and not...

Agreed. It's also something that a defender must do that the attacker doesn't obviously.



Co-sign.



That's not an attacker. That's a skiddie, there's a difference.

*sigh*



Oh well.. and guys, can we please not turn this thread to ****? I like this topic. Cacosapo, like I said, your comments weren't needed. I appreciate the greens and ****, but honestly...

Co-sign and cacosapo that wasn't needed. Anyways, back on topic..

I think the average defense concerns more than merely setting up the firewall and it's permissions. You can't simply load up a...

Co-sign and an excellent point. It is one person against an entire world of people. People who are capable of anything and people who eventually one of them will be smarter/skilled than you are....

I wonder why :rolleyes:

Ehh, quite the opposite actually. I know quite a few people here who have either done something illegal and "reformed" or people who posses the knowledge and can/will do something if needbe. Again...

Co-sign. And what qualifies you, ¤The¤Spe©ialist, to judge who is/isn't qualified to post their definition/classification of others? Blah.. whatever. More of the same from you man.

Not only can any idiot write one BUT they can easily LEARN how to write one. Thus making a script kiddie.

IMO -- Defense. The person attacking can easily learn how to, easily knows what to expect (for the most part), and is the one "in the drivers seat" of the situation. Defense however, is difficult...