December 15th, 2001, 02:09 AM
to around the question is not pointless. In theory is this not a question about time. This is statistics, there is the possibility to have a monkey who makes the work. This would be very strange but...
December 14th, 2001, 08:03 PM
And I had some remarks against the things Larrjys said and so the thing is going straight to the top
December 14th, 2001, 07:32 PM
Yes, the language is an issue, but there is more:
- the reply 'to be or not to be' has no co-relation with the monkey if you fail to see that relation.
- the monkey can write the shakespeare...
December 14th, 2001, 06:58 PM
If you look at "to be or not to be"
you can see 3 things instead of 2
1) to be
2) not to be
3) to be or not to bo
first: alive, second: dead, the third could be refering to a kind of...
December 14th, 2001, 02:02 AM
I still believe the monkey can do it.
He has plenty of time cause:
when you look at the complete volume of shakespears works written by the monkey as 1 event in spacetime the chance that event...
December 14th, 2001, 01:03 AM
The monkey can write the complete volume of shakespears works, cause otherwise there wouldn't be the probability that surpases 10 to the 40th power. You need to make a difference between micro...