Search Results - Antionline Forums - Maximum Security for a Connected World

Search:

Type: Posts; User: GuardianAngel; Keyword(s):

Search: Search took 0.01 seconds.

  1. Replies
    0
    Views
    485

    A friendly Hello

    After watching posts here for a bit, I figured I would stop in here and say Hi.

    I try to keep up with whatever I can that may assist me in helping visitors to our sites, so I frequent most of the...
  2. Nor am I attacking your comments souleman, just...

    Nor am I attacking your comments souleman, just making some points.

    I understand your concern with such a vociferous promo of a previously dubious product. And yes the original poster could be a...
  3. Replies
    151
    Views
    9,522

    Poll: 47 .... yet.... eternal .......

    47 .... yet.... eternal .......
  4. souleman > agreed to a few of your points re:...

    souleman > agreed to a few of your points re: endusers and false sense of security.

    We spend a lot of time working with people requesting ruleset review, etc. Even then, one wrong click and ........
  5. :) Ah yes, Linux. *nix for that matter! But...

    :) Ah yes, Linux. *nix for that matter!

    But as long as Windoze remains the predominent environment, *nix won't help the other 90%+ of the 'Nets population.

    And anything I can do to help those...
  6. I understand your position souleman, many...

    I understand your position souleman, many subscribe to the idea that if you have all unecessary services disabled, use an av and an at, and watch your own activities (DLs, allows, have proper browser...
  7. It is true that BID created a "Cheat" in their...

    It is true that BID created a "Cheat" in their previous version, and it is true that there are plenty of good free firewalls available.

    However, there are many who have been hammering v3.5 to run...
Results 1 to 7 of 7