Search:
Type: Posts; User: mnstrgrl; Keyword(s):
Search:
Search took 0.05 seconds.
-
November 15th, 2006, 03:17 PM
Oops, misread. Yes, all IDs for threads and posts have changed, so bookmarks will be wrong. You'll have to use site search to find them and re-bookmark.
-
November 14th, 2006, 10:24 PM
Have you tried http://www.antionline.com/faq/, rather than http://www.antionline.com/faq.php? The first is the default FAQ system provided by vB, the other is a separate FAQ system we installed some...
-
October 3rd, 2005, 07:53 PM
I've updated the years.
- h
-
September 6th, 2005, 09:25 PM
Hm, I thought we had one.
How about this: can we replace the "Website Status" area of the front page with a link to the stats page? It should speed up the rendering time for the home page, and...
-
September 6th, 2005, 08:21 PM
See my comment here about this.
- h
-
September 6th, 2005, 08:14 PM
Update on the stats page: I've added some additional lists, most of the Top 10 lists from the front page. This is in part in response to the request to bring back the "10 newest members" list,...
-
September 6th, 2005, 07:20 PM
I fixed a bunch of holes... if there's one (or more) left, give me details and I'll look into fixing them.
- h
-
September 6th, 2005, 02:31 PM
Changing the number of posts required for Addicts access is easy. Changing the access method to APs instead of posts is not easy, requires lots of code changes. I don't have an opinion either way...
-
September 6th, 2005, 02:21 PM
I'm on it. The stats page was rushed to live before it was ready. I was working on adding some other lists to the stats displayed there, including newest 10 members, but didn't get a chance to add...
-
August 4th, 2005, 10:13 PM
I increased the field size a bit. Thanks for the heads-up.
- h
-
August 4th, 2005, 10:03 PM
Links are finally fixed on the stats page.
- h
-
August 4th, 2005, 09:03 PM
There was a but, and it's been fixed.
- h
-
December 27th, 2004, 08:46 PM
The problem may be on your end.... I've never seen this myself or heard about it happening to anyone else. I'm not even sure what the "Wrom" designation is for, google has been very unhelpful on...
-
December 27th, 2004, 04:15 PM
That's quite strange. I don't understand at all why you'd get the strange "Wrom" output. Are you saying your URL was replaced with that text? There's no reason for that in the code, and I have...
-
December 27th, 2004, 04:03 PM
"hi mom" is my test phrase when I'm working on code. I'm sure you ran into this while I wasn't quite done with some bit of something, or maybe I forgot to remove it before I launched changes.
...
-
December 22nd, 2004, 05:26 PM
jinxy -- can you elaborate on this problem? I'm not clear exactly what's going wrong.
- h
-
December 20th, 2004, 07:13 PM
I should be able to do this, but I've got some other projects on right now, so I won't get to it within the next few days.
- h
-
December 2nd, 2004, 03:14 PM
Odd, i was just able to add a new sig image and include it in my sig, no errors.
MsM, I see images for you saved in the DB.
You should be able to click on the image in the sig edit page and...
-
December 1st, 2004, 04:32 PM
Explain? These are images uploaded through the sig edit page, correct? Is the problem that when you include them in your sig, they don't show up?
- h
-
November 28th, 2004, 05:09 PM
I see an image in your sig, is this still a problem?
- h
-
November 5th, 2004, 02:23 PM
We occasionally run feedback surveys for use by Jupm, not sure if that's one of those or not. As I mentioned in another thread today, I have no control over ads served on this site; I can't do...
-
November 5th, 2004, 02:14 PM
Looks like ad code to me... i wouldn't worry about it. Ads occasionally are badly coded and wreck pages, but I have no control over the code for ads served here.
- h
-
November 2nd, 2004, 02:18 AM
I'll take a look at this.
- h
-
November 2nd, 2004, 02:09 AM
The easiest solution would be to allow in-line posting of images in the tutorials forum.
Spyder -- current admins are:
intmon, JupMan, mnstrgrl, LordB, Richard1, ram_page_rom, phernandez
...
-
October 25th, 2004, 09:18 PM
I checked into this and error checking worked -- I wasn't allowed to assign twice to the same thread. I'll look into it further if the error recurs.
- h
|
|