July 24th, 2004, 07:14 PM
I could probably say I know Win98 and WinMe like the back of my hand. I'm slowly learning OpenBSD like the back of my hand as well, but I'm gradually learning the in's and out's of that OS. It's...
July 24th, 2004, 05:54 PM
Yeah, moreso on NT4 though. Gotta love the code for it though and how it was built into Win2k.
Wow, never knew that. Thanks pooh :)
If I haven't said it once, I'll say it again:...
July 23rd, 2004, 10:55 PM
No doubt. It all is "in the eye of the beholder" though. Meaning it's all up the user, is the OS'es security.
July 23rd, 2004, 08:54 PM
Couldn't agree more. My Win98 box is more secure than my friend's Redhat box (probably because he doesn't believe in physical security :D) and it work's relatively well compared to the typical...
July 23rd, 2004, 08:41 PM
Calling Window's ME secure is like calling a homeless person for some money.
July 23rd, 2004, 08:28 PM
Er, why would you say that? Window's 2000 is actually quite secure (if not THE most secure distribution of the Window's family) and is very stable. If anything, I wanna keep your curiosity alive ;)
July 23rd, 2004, 08:18 PM
There is no "at an extent" with me. :D
July 23rd, 2004, 08:02 PM
Ahh the testing day's.. *sighs*
I take serious heart to that ;) My box is stable, reliable, secure, and NICE. :D I'm in the process of switching firewall's though. /me need's to find that...