I think you have a lil too much time on your hands Negative
I'm having two weeks off.
Knowledge is power - Francis Bacon
Francis Bacon was found guilty of corruptly having accepted money in 1621. That was 24 years after having finished his Meditationes Sacrae. He should have known better
__________________
Consequential Equations
--------------------------------
If X , Y , Z are = angles of a triangle ;
then X , Y , Z = 60*
If God was a programmer;
then he would be using a Linux box.
Actually, X, Y, and Z, would be 60° only if X=Y=Z.
The only rule all-the-time-rule-for-a-triangle would be that (internal angles) X+Y+Z=180.
If God was a programmer, he would, and presumably does use, Universe++, which is only compilable onto a system running the SpaceTime Infinity processor, which only runs RealityOS.
Consequential Equations
--------------------------------
If X , Y , Z are = angles of a triangle ;
then X , Y , Z = 60*
If God was a programmer;
then he would be using a Linux box.
I am already well-aware of the tricks that have been played by the brilliant Mr. Escher...
But I would point out that they violate no law, since they are 2-dimensional objects which merely trick us into thinking they are a 2-d representation of a perspective of a 3d object.
And yes, I know what a Komodo Dragon is... but how did that get into the discussion?
Ah, I just noticed something...
If X , Y , Z are = angles of a triangle ;
then X , Y , Z = 60*
I think I see the logic, but the phrasing is VERY misleading.
"If X,Y,Z are (equal to EACH OTHER and are) angles of a triangle"
is not the same as
"If X,Y,Z (represent, symbolize, are equal to) angles of a triangle."
Actually, X, Y, and Z, would be 60° only if X=Y=Z.
The only rule all-the-time-rule-for-a-triangle would be that (internal angles) X+Y+Z=180.
If God was a programmer, he would, and presumably does use, Universe++, which is only compilable onto a system running the SpaceTime Infinity processor, which only runs RealityOS.
Actually there are triangles that can have less that 180* or more than 180* they were developed by gauss and some other guy independantly, I can't remember the second guy. imagine a *striaght* line on the surface of the earth is actually quite curved in 3d space, thus a *straight* triangle in 2d space taken from a 3d impose of a triangle would be greater than 2pi radians. one on the inside of a "saddle" would be less than one.