November 19th, 2001, 05:58 PM
November 19th, 2001, 06:02 PM
1. p1 200 MHz mmx rehat 7.2 kernel 2.4.7 (still can't get the tuxbox to ip-masquarade)
2. p3 600 MHz win2000 prof./redhat 7.2 kernel:2.4.7
3. p3 800 MHz/133 fsb 512Mb ram 20 gigs, 2gig jaz scsi,12x10x32 cdr,32 lite-on geforce2gts 64 mb ram,win2000 prof./redhat 7.2 kernel:2.4.7
4. inspiron 8100 p3 1000 MHz, geforce2 go 32 Mb ram, 15" @1600x1200,10/100 network-card,8x,6x,32x cdrw,win2000 prof./redhat 7.2 kernel:2.4.7
November 19th, 2001, 06:51 PM
Compaq laptop 400mhz 96mb ram, piece of crap
My real beauty: IBM 286 (33mhz!) with a whopping 640k of ram, with the 'new' vga video technology. That thing is the heaviest typewriter i've ever seen.
\"If you can\'t make it good, make it look good.\" - Bill Gates
November 19th, 2001, 06:54 PM
Nintendo 64 dual boot with a sega master system -1k of ram
November 19th, 2001, 07:15 PM
November 19th, 2001, 07:54 PM
I'm glad you people are so mature
\\you cannot stand the truth
The AntiPoints level on this post is somewhat negative.
You have -137 AntiPoints.
What others are saying about this post...
hope u get cancer u ****
November 19th, 2001, 07:56 PM
How the hell Knightmb did u get them to stick to the ceiling upsidedown u must be the hacker 31337 that everybody goes on about
where u from hehbris ..Im guessing maybe the u.k. with your ease of use of the word **** cos i think most Americans hate the use of that word..maybe im wrong
November 19th, 2001, 08:08 PM
I editted it because surely this would have started a riot
November 19th, 2001, 08:16 PM
Can't stand the truth eh hehbris, you say a 386 running linux is only good for running vi, and thats the truth is it? I'd have to disagree - one of my 386 boxen runs ntop, kepping an eye on everything going in and coming out of my network. Another 386 i use as a testbed for development in perl. Am i using 10% of my computers efficiency? (and what the **** is a computers efficiency anyway?)
And what about amd being for people from federally funded housing, as intel clones go, you'd be hard pushed to find a better chip. Maybe you can show me some statistics to back your claim up - and i don't want to hear you spout any **** about sparc's or alphas either, be realistic.
And i have 3 386's, not 4 - you dumb****.
November 19th, 2001, 08:19 PM
1) p3 800, 256 mb ram(only at pc100 tho:-/), 20 gig hd, GeForce 256, some crappy cdrw, a toshiba dvd-rom, creative dvd decoder card, nic card(not sure what, it came with my dsl install kit), sb live! platnum w/ live drive, creative DDT 5.1 surround speakers, dont know mobo cause i got this one from gateway. running win2k.
2) amd t-bird 850, 128 mb ram(pc 133), 40 gig hd(ultra-100), GeForce 2, creative cdrw(i think), nic card(cant remember what i got), Asus A7v Mobo, sb live! x-gamer, boston acustic 2.1 speakers. running win2k, soon to be dual booting with linux so i can learn that.
3) amd t-bird 1.something ghz, 30 gig hd, GeForce (2?) DDR, cdrw, dvd-rom(software decoding), nic card, sb live! x-gamer, asus mobo, klipsh 2.1 speakers. running win2k.(this is the one my bro built so i dont know the specs as well)
4) unused 486 sitting in my basement
There are 10 types of people in this world: those who understand binary, and those who dont.