December 5th, 2001, 09:24 AM
If linux made toasters, they would be free, only compatible with rye bread, and would take a toast expert to operate.
December 5th, 2001, 09:43 AM
If aol sold toasters, they would cost more than everyone else's toaster, yet have less uses, yet everyone who never had a toaster before would get one.
If wal-mart sold toasters......wait a second, they do sell toasters........
Wine maketh merry: but money answereth all things.
December 5th, 2001, 12:46 PM
Why are we so obsessed with toasters? i feel the need to run out and purchase one. AAAAAAAAAHH!
December 5th, 2001, 01:41 PM
HP doesn't make crappy machines it's Packard Bell, they sell like hot cakes in europe because most of the morons living here don't know what a "good name" Packard Bell has got in the USA back in the 80's when they sold **** for computers. Selling old/used components etc.
HP's technology is by far more superior the Gateway or Compaq.
December 5th, 2001, 02:05 PM
I still have a Packard Bell today and that machine is the only one that still has all the original parts. The only problems I ever had came when I installed the earlier versions of Linux.
December 5th, 2001, 02:30 PM
December 5th, 2001, 03:56 PM
If linux made a toatster
If linux made a toaster
1. It would be free
2. There would be thousands and thousands of them
3. Every "Good Toaster" would recomend it and if you didn't have it they would repremand you.
4. It would be very hard for newbies to operate it
5. It's lighter/darker function would be called FauxUv/GNDRKE
Do it now and ask for forgiveness later