Is Distributed Computing a Crime?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Is Distributed Computing a Crime?

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    1,255

    Is Distributed Computing a Crime?

    From http://www.securityfocus.com/news/300:
    A computer network administrator faces multiple felony charges and years in a Georgia prison for allegedly installing Distributed.net clients without permission. Prosecutors say its justice, others aren't so sure
    By Ann Harrison
    Dec 20 2001 12:44AM PT

    A college computer technician who offered his school's unused computer processing power for an encryption research project will be tried next month in Georgia for computer theft and trespassing charges that carry a potential total of 120 years in jail.

    The closely-watched case if one of the first in which state prosecutors have lodged felony charges for allegedly downloading third-party software without permission.

    David McOwen was working as a PC specialist at the state-run DeKalb Technical Institute in 1998, when he learned about a project by the non-profit organization distributed.net that allowed computer users to donate their unused processing power to test the RC5 encryption algorithm. Noticing that many of the machines he maintained on the seven DeKalb campuses sat idle for long periods, McOwen installed distributed.net clients at several of those locations while performing a Y2K upgrade on the machines in 1999.

    According to McOwen, during the Christmas holidays in 1999 school administrators noticed that unused machines were sending and receiving the distributed.net data -- about the equivalent of one email a day. The school sent McOwen a letter of suspension in January of 2000, without specifying a grievance, and McOwen resigned shortly afterwards, believing that he had put the incident behind him.

    Instead, in June of 2001 McOwen was contacted by an investigator from the Georgia Bureau of Investigation who informed him that he was the subject of an 18-month computer crime investigation. In October, prosecutors from the Georgia state attorney general's office charged McOwen with eight violations of Georgia's tough computer crime law: one count of computer theft, and seven counts of computer trespass -- one for each of the school offices where McOwen downloaded the distributed.net client.


    Read more at the site above...

    Anyways, I'd like to know what you guys think. Given that there's a reward involved, do you think he committed a crime, and why?
    Chris Shepherd
    The Nelson-Shepherd cutoff: The point at which you realise someone is an idiot while trying to help them.
    \"Well as far as the spelling, I speak fluently both your native languages. Do you even can try spell mine ?\" -- Failed Insult
    Is your whole family retarded, or did they just catch it from you?
    Share on Google+

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    472
    I think 120 years in prison might be a little too long for this type of incident. I'm not completely sure if this is even a good enough reason for loosing his job.

    I don't know how the program behaves, but I guess there's some chance it might contain a security hole, and therefore could be a threat to the network. And that could be a reason for fireing someone.

    I've heard people have gotten fired for using peer-to-peer software like Morpheus, because of possible security threats.
    ---
    proactive
    Share on Google+

  3. #3

    Talking

    "This is a hacking statute," says McOwen, "but obviously this is not hacking."
    Do you see how rediculous computer laws are getting? This is probably the guys first offence. He gets a harsher sentence than ALOT of other more serious criminals get. If the gov. would put as much forensics and effort into other crime as they do in computer crimes then we would have alot lower crime rate. IMO, it's bullsh*t..

    A $1,000 prize goes to the individual contributor who recovers the RC5 encryption key.
    If you offered a reward to every witness of a crime scene, there would be alot of $$$ wasted for information that should be freely given with out charge.

    "I think the prosecutor's office needs some lessons in computer science," says Farber. "If you want to make a point, there are much better examples than this guy."
    Thats correct. CHSH tell him what he's won! Nothing. Why not? 'Cause the prosecutors don't need to know anything about computer science. All they do is suck the $$$ out of your wallet.. I hate lawyers..

    The case is set for trial on January 28th.

    Remote_Access_
    Share on Google+

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    590

    Angry

    This is madness, ok if the boss is mad about it just yell at the employee. But dragging him to court?
    Share on Google+

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    95

    Angry

    This is just another step to 1984 guys. But it is really insane that they can drag you to court for cooperating with distributed.net. Firing him, well, maybe. But he faces up to 120 years. That's *****in crazy man.

    I say long live distributed computing!
    .. and a short one to all the bureaucrats that are buzy making the USA unliveable.

    Grtz,
    Share on Google+

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    65
    ________________________________________
    The indictment also calls for restitution equal to the amount of money paid to state workers to uninstall the programs from 500 PCs.
    ________________________________________

    Come on!, use ghost and it will be done in 20 minutes.

    If we let them do this to McOwen, they are gonna do worse things to each and everyone of us. Computer law is getting more than stupid!!!
    Todo lo que no me mata me hace mas fuerte...
    Share on Google+

  7. #7
    AntiOnline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    514
    I think that up to 120 years in prison is nuts for a case like this.
    [shadow]uraloony, Founder of Loony Services[/shadow]
    Visit us at
    [gloworange]http://www.loonyservices.com/[/gloworange]
    Share on Google+

  8. #8
    Priapistic Monk KorpDeath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    2,628
    So do something about it. You elect the dumb assh#$%s that put these laws in. Vote them out. Run yourself.
    Quit whining about 1984 It'll never happen, the reason for this is simple. Most people would freely give up their "rights" for the new SEEN ON TV gimmick. You should read "amusing ourselves to death". By Neil Postman Good book. NOW GO READ.

    P.S. They should fire him, not jail him. I think they'll have a hard time proving malicious intent. Good luck
    Mankind have a great aversion to intellectual labor; but even supposing knowledge to be easily attainable, more people would be content to be ignorant than would take even a little trouble to acquire it.
    - Samuel Johnson
    Share on Google+

  9. #9
    AO Curmudgeon rcgreen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    2,716

    Thumbs up

    Democracy is useless when you are outnumbered
    I came in to the world with nothing. I still have most of it.
    Share on Google+

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Posts
    343

    Angry IDOTS!!!

    Hi All;

    I have seen dumb stuff before but this ices the cake!
    Most DA's and Cops should stay out of the computer
    law enforcement end, all they do is cost poor Joes who
    are trying to scratch out a living in this industry
    many thousands of dollars in legal fees because
    of no understanding of computers.

    Maybe he was wrong but 120 years, Heck OJ
    got away with murder if do not beleve the defense
    side of things. I guess the more money in lawers
    you spend the more Justice.

    I system admin for a company who's boss has that on
    his computer... And this company is a multi-million dollar
    outfit.
    Franklin Werren at www.bagpipes.net
    Yes I do play the Bagpipes!

    And learning to Play the Bugle
    Share on Google+

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •