Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22

Thread: Wargames! (The truth about them)

  1. #11
    AO Soccer Mom debwalin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    2,185
    Whoa! I've never seen anybody banned before!! Haven't been here too long either though....
    Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.

  2. #12
    Priapistic Monk KorpDeath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    2,628
    And this was two in one shot. Nice!!!
    Mankind have a great aversion to intellectual labor; but even supposing knowledge to be easily attainable, more people would be content to be ignorant than would take even a little trouble to acquire it.
    - Samuel Johnson

  3. #13
    Mr.dos

    it must really suck to be you.

    Crimina1

  4. #14
    Fastest Thing Alive s0nIc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,584
    hmmm.. being in few wargames myself... all i can say is that its all very repetitive..
    i dont see how the lurkers can tell one hacker from another in those wargames coz they all use thesame technique to get pass each level.. no distinction really,....

    and i noticed that its the hosts are more scared than the guests.. coz anyone can login and stuff up the server or eat the bandwith....

    But you made a good point there Mr. Dos..

  5. #15
    but remote_accses_ was flamed for the same thing
    Burned to a friggin' crisp.

    After a few threads I quickly realized that you'll get alot better reputation if you show the source. But, some people catch on quicker than others. Hopefully you've learned your lesson.

    Netsyn.. constructive critisizm is better than flaming but your post is too long. I just skimmed over it but you do have a point.. somewhere in that post, I just don't feel like lookin' for it.

    Remote_Access_

  6. #16
    AntiOnline Senior Medicine Man
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    724
    I have seen 3 banned now.

    Haraam77> One of the Taliban
    Mr.Dos> That guy
    audioluv> dun have a clue
    It is better to be HATED for who you are, than LOVED for who you are NOT.

    THC/IP Version 4.2

  7. #17
    Jesus Christ I've never heard so much ****ing bull **** from everyone on this thread!

    FOCKERS!

  8. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    376
    Looks like Oblio was banned too...

    Could we have a "Wall of Shame" for them?
    - Jimmy Mac

    Replicants are like any technology, if there not a hazard, its not my problem....

  9. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    107
    I knew I had read that somewhere...

    A Complete Hacker's Handbook: Everything You need to know about Hacking in the Age of the Web by Dr K.

    Damn thief doesn't give credit.

  10. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    218
    i think a wall of shame will just popularize this type of behavior. giving it any extra notice will most likely just encourage these types to earn their name on the wall of shame. it is best to just ignore them. banning seems a bit much though. they should have a chance to redeem themselves. besides, every community has its "town idiots." they make it more interesting and sometimes entertaining. banning should be the last resort if they trully have no place in the ao community.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •