MS security patch fails on local files
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: MS security patch fails on local files

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    410

    Exclamation MS security patch fails on local files

    From The Register
    -----

    MS security patch fails on local files
    By Thomas C Greene in Washington
    Posted: 04/02/2002 at 07:17 EST

    The MS patch intended to fix a data binding flaw in IE, which enables a script to call executables on your Windows machine using the object tag, does not protect against malicious files launched from a local directory.

    We had several anecdotal reports of trouble -- enough to cause alarm -- and went so far as to wipe a perfectly good Linux image off one of our machines and do a clean install of Win-XP. We then installed the relevant Microsoft Critical Security Update, and then ran an example script which harmlessly calls calc.exe against the machine.

    We were able to run the progie without the slightest impediment from a local directory. If we hadn't tested the Critical Security Update with a live exploit, we'd never have known of its limitations.

    Update
    However, with further tinkering we were unable to run the script from a remote location (i.e., a Web page) or in the body of an e-mail or as an e-mail attachment once the patch was applied.

    Apparently, the patch approaches the data binding issue indirectly, by restricting script permissions in the Internet zone.

    We questioned whether this approach offers adequate protection, or if it's really just a partial workaround.

    "The patch prevents the exploit scenario as originally presented, i.e., visiting a malicious Web site which launches an exe on your system," MS Trustworthy Computing Team Senior Security Program Manager Eric Schultze told us.

    "The patch prevents what users are concerned about: they shouldn't fear to install it thinking that it doesn't fix the problem. It in fact does fix the exploit scenario."

    However, it seems reasonable to imagine that that quite a few people would copy an HTML attachment to a local directory and open it if their e-mail settings prevented them from seeing what they'd received. One might well say, 'well, it's only a little Web page, after all...where's the harm in that?'

    "The patch does exactly what the bulletin makes it out to do, though whether this is the user's expectation is another matter," Schultze allows.

    So I'd like to query our readers on this. E-mail me and let me know if you think the patch is adequate and we're making too much of too little here, or if you think it should be extended to the local computer zone, or even be re-worked completely to eliminate the data-binding/ object-tag vulnerability altogether.
    -------
    One more reason not to use IE

    How very irritating. If I install a patch, I want it to fix the damn the thing. Talk about giving user's the feeling of being secure, but in fact not.
    savIRC :: The Multi-Platform IRC Client v. 1.8 [Released 9.04.02]

  2. #2
    AntiOnline Senior Member souleman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Flint, MI
    Posts
    2,884
    Theregister was running the script locally - in the myComputer zone. If
    you host the malicious html on a webpage, etc. then the patch does indeed
    prevent the execution of code.
    From the bugtraq mail list.....

    Obviously, the register may have been able to run the script, but it doesn't have anythig to do with what the patch was supposed to fix.

    I hate it when MS does something right
    \"Ignorance is bliss....
    but only for your enemy\"
    -- souleman

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •