-
April 17th, 2002, 08:31 PM
#1
-
April 17th, 2002, 08:49 PM
#2
I hope they rewrite it, and the new one passes.
-
April 17th, 2002, 08:49 PM
#3
Xmadness,
I can understand you care about your little sister, but I think you're missing something...
Here's a couple of remarks:
- We're talking about VIRTUAL child porn here ("All models are 18 years of age or older. Proof of age can be acquired by emailing the webmaster"), not about abusing minors. (IMO, porn on the internet is for loosers who never tasted the real thing, but that's off-topic here).
- The US of A are so fond of their freedom of speach. If they would ban this kind of 'innocent' porn, they'd be acting against the First Amendment - A court is supposed to do what the law says, not what they/you think is right. Banning this kind of porn would mean getting rid of the First. I see you edited your post while I'm writing this - I still have a remark though: What's the use of your First Amendment if it only applies to some cases, and not to others?
- You say this kind of porn is going to open the door for 'these perverts'... I say BANNING this kind of porn is going to open the door for 'these perverts': if they can't get their kicks on the (virtual) net, they'll have to get them somewhere else...
-
April 17th, 2002, 08:51 PM
#4
Click here to virtually rape a ten year old boy!
www.virtualrape.org
============================================================
You know whats sick? Is that this will probley be an actual banner for these sickos. Its like we wont let the Taliban communicate online, but the sick pedo-philes can have a field day. What the ****!?!
<Gets the napalm ready>
<Adds Thermite>
*not terror threat- for you paranoid NSA peeps
It is better to be HATED for who you are, than LOVED for who you are NOT.
THC/IP Version 4.2
-
April 17th, 2002, 08:52 PM
#5
It isn't like they have given pedophiles the "right of way". They simply undid a too broad of law. I bet you wouldn't be in an uproar if the DMCA was revoked, like this law was.
Don't get me wrong here. I hate pedophilia just as much as the next 'sane' person. There is a good discussion on SlashDot about this.
http://slashdot.org/yro/02/04/16/1615221.shtml?tid=123
-
April 17th, 2002, 09:22 PM
#6
Negative> I like pron, and I have "tasted the real thing"
Ok, so it was only once, but hey....
\"Ignorance is bliss....
but only for your enemy\"
-- souleman
-
April 17th, 2002, 09:33 PM
#7
-
April 17th, 2002, 09:34 PM
#8
Ditto to every single thing Negative says. Thanks for pointing this out, xmaddness, but I totally agree with Neg on this one. Freedom of speech is not a personal issue, and it can't be biased at all. If it is, then it's not true freedom of speech.
-
April 17th, 2002, 09:45 PM
#9
Originally posted here by jehnx
Ditto to every single thing Negative says. Thanks for pointing this out, xmaddness, but I totally agree with Neg on this one. Freedom of speech is not a personal issue, and it can't be biased at all. If it is, then it's not true freedom of speech.
If they care at all about free speech, they'll
strike down the recent campaign finance
reform law that makes it illegal for you to buy
television time to advertise your opinions
about political candidates
LINK
I came in to the world with nothing. I still have most of it.
-
April 17th, 2002, 09:52 PM
#10
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|