Absolutly pissed
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Absolutly pissed

  1. #1
    Webius Designerous Indiginous
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    1,123

    Angry Absolutly pissed

    Supreme Court strikes down ban on 'virtual child porn'

    [RANT]This is absolutly disgusting. I cannot believe the Supreme Court has okayed these disgusting types of porn. I honestly have almost completely lost all respect for the Supreme Courts decisions. I mean come on... This is simply going to open the door for these perverts and give them an alley to convene on. Whats from stopping these perverts from getting off on the virtual type and decideing that they need to go and get the real thing? IMHO I think this is one of the most ****ed up things I have seen in a long time. [/RANT]

    Plese excuse my french, but I have a little sister that I care alot about, and the possibilty that these perverts will be allowed to view this type of stuff really worries me.


    SUPREME COURT'S DECISION



    EDIT: Don't get me wrong, I like the fact that the first amendment was upheld, but this is a sick use of it.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    355

    Post

    I hope they rewrite it, and the new one passes.
    \"SI JE PUIS\"

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Yes
    Posts
    4,424
    Xmadness,

    I can understand you care about your little sister, but I think you're missing something...

    Here's a couple of remarks:

    - We're talking about VIRTUAL child porn here ("All models are 18 years of age or older. Proof of age can be acquired by emailing the webmaster"), not about abusing minors. (IMO, porn on the internet is for loosers who never tasted the real thing, but that's off-topic here).

    - The US of A are so fond of their freedom of speach. If they would ban this kind of 'innocent' porn, they'd be acting against the First Amendment - A court is supposed to do what the law says, not what they/you think is right. Banning this kind of porn would mean getting rid of the First. I see you edited your post while I'm writing this - I still have a remark though: What's the use of your First Amendment if it only applies to some cases, and not to others?

    - You say this kind of porn is going to open the door for 'these perverts'... I say BANNING this kind of porn is going to open the door for 'these perverts': if they can't get their kicks on the (virtual) net, they'll have to get them somewhere else...

  4. #4
    AntiOnline Senior Medicine Man
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    724
    Click here to virtually rape a ten year old boy!
    www.virtualrape.org
    ============================================================
    You know whats sick? Is that this will probley be an actual banner for these sickos. Its like we wont let the Taliban communicate online, but the sick pedo-philes can have a field day. What the ****!?!

    <Gets the napalm ready>
    <Adds Thermite>

    *not terror threat- for you paranoid NSA peeps
    It is better to be HATED for who you are, than LOVED for who you are NOT.

    THC/IP Version 4.2

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    410
    It isn't like they have given pedophiles the "right of way". They simply undid a too broad of law. I bet you wouldn't be in an uproar if the DMCA was revoked, like this law was.

    Don't get me wrong here. I hate pedophilia just as much as the next 'sane' person. There is a good discussion on SlashDot about this.
    http://slashdot.org/yro/02/04/16/1615221.shtml?tid=123
    savIRC :: The Multi-Platform IRC Client v. 1.8 [Released 9.04.02]

  6. #6
    AntiOnline Senior Member souleman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Flint, MI
    Posts
    2,884
    Negative> I like pron, and I have "tasted the real thing"

    Ok, so it was only once, but hey....
    \"Ignorance is bliss....
    but only for your enemy\"
    -- souleman

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    46
    LOL, Good Day to you all

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    884
    Ditto to every single thing Negative says. Thanks for pointing this out, xmaddness, but I totally agree with Neg on this one. Freedom of speech is not a personal issue, and it can't be biased at all. If it is, then it's not true freedom of speech.

  9. #9
    AO Curmudgeon rcgreen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    2,716
    Originally posted here by jehnx
    Ditto to every single thing Negative says. Thanks for pointing this out, xmaddness, but I totally agree with Neg on this one. Freedom of speech is not a personal issue, and it can't be biased at all. If it is, then it's not true freedom of speech.
    If they care at all about free speech, they'll
    strike down the recent campaign finance
    reform law that makes it illegal for you to buy
    television time to advertise your opinions
    about political candidates

    LINK
    I came in to the world with nothing. I still have most of it.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    227
    Originally posted here by souleman
    Negative> I like pron, and I have "tasted the real thing"

    Ok, so it was only once, but hey....

    Don't be sad soulman... I'm sure that SOMEday you'll taste it for the second time
    http://promote.opera.com/small/opera94x15.gif

    [gloworange]Sun7dots[/gloworange]

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •