[glowpurple]There were so many fewer questions when the stars where still just the holes to heaven - JJ[/glowpurple] [gloworange]I sure could use a vacation from this bull$hit, three ringed circus side show of freaks. - Tool. [/gloworange]
Are you trying to tell me that Microsoft could possibly be responsible for a product that makes it harder to imlement security? Never... On a serious note, I was especially interested in the part about DCOM not working over NAT. I know a lot of companies and organizations that use NAT extensively in their architecture. What are they supposed to do? Seems to be yet another poor policy decision from Microsoft.
Poor decision from Microsoft...... like beer and pizza.. Seems to me you'd be hard pressed to find a "good decision" by the Redmond fire ants. Oh well.
Reply With Quote
On a serious note, I was especially interested in the part about DCOM not working over NAT. I know a lot of companies and organizations that use NAT extensively in their architecture. What are they supposed to do? Seems to be yet another poor policy decision from Microsoft. 
Bookmarks