June 11th, 2002, 12:01 PM
I agree somewhat with NetSyn, a lot of the users who visit IRC don't post on the forums and vice-versa, I hardly ever visit IRC but post on the forums quite often and I'm sure that there are other members with a similar or converse situation. It wouldn't really be worth the hassle to implement such a scheme because hardly anyone would use it, the system would be open to even more abuse than it is now, and it would only benefit a very small number of members.
June 11th, 2002, 08:28 PM
whoever redded me in this thread about my sig, i dont care! im an adult and if u cant deal with a little bad language in my sig, **** YOU!
JP`s only prob with it was its size, nothing bout language
thats for redding me, on summin i like an wanna do
June 12th, 2002, 01:49 AM
This has to be the dumbest site suggestion ever. Why the hell would you actually want the dreaded antipoint in IRC? You should be enjoying the freedom you have in IRC without fear of someone not liking what you have to say and assigning you negs.
Antipoints take away from free speech (some thing you Americans are supposed to stand for) and are a form of censorship. Now we are even being told how to assign them! It's ****ing ridiculous.
preep: nice signature....
June 12th, 2002, 04:35 AM
Just to put my .02 cents worth in-- I'd rather not have Antipoints in IRC. I think the suggestion was well meant, but I am against it.
For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.
(Romans 6:23, WEB)
June 12th, 2002, 05:14 AM
Yes, I suppose it was well meant and I apologise if I came across a little harsh.
June 12th, 2002, 06:17 AM
While I appreciate the idea, there really is no practical way to implement this.
Thanks for the suggestion though!