AP's in IRC? - Page 2
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: AP's in IRC?

  1. #11
    AO Antique pwaring's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    1,408
    I agree somewhat with NetSyn, a lot of the users who visit IRC don't post on the forums and vice-versa, I hardly ever visit IRC but post on the forums quite often and I'm sure that there are other members with a similar or converse situation. It wouldn't really be worth the hassle to implement such a scheme because hardly anyone would use it, the system would be open to even more abuse than it is now, and it would only benefit a very small number of members.
    Paul Waring - Web site design and development.
    Share on Google+

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    255
    whoever redded me in this thread about my sig, i dont care! im an adult and if u cant deal with a little bad language in my sig, **** YOU!

    JP`s only prob with it was its size, nothing bout language

    thats for redding me, on summin i like an wanna do

    preep
    http://www.attrition.org/gallery/computing/forum/tn/youarenot.gif.html
    Share on Google+

  3. #13
    This has to be the dumbest site suggestion ever. Why the hell would you actually want the dreaded antipoint in IRC? You should be enjoying the freedom you have in IRC without fear of someone not liking what you have to say and assigning you negs.

    Antipoints take away from free speech (some thing you Americans are supposed to stand for) and are a form of censorship. Now we are even being told how to assign them! It's ****ing ridiculous.


    preep: nice signature....
    Share on Google+

  4. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    856
    Just to put my .02 cents worth in-- I'd rather not have Antipoints in IRC. I think the suggestion was well meant, but I am against it.
    For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.
    (Romans 6:23, WEB)
    Share on Google+

  5. #15
    Yes, I suppose it was well meant and I apologise if I came across a little harsh.
    Share on Google+

  6. #16
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Posts
    1,100
    Greetings All:

    While I appreciate the idea, there really is no practical way to implement this.

    Thanks for the suggestion though!

    thread closed.
    Share on Google+

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

 Security News

     Patches

       Security Trends

         How-To

           Buying Guides