June 14th, 2002, 02:04 PM
IMHO would I like to see this suggestion by pwaring implemented .
Originally posted here by pwaring
June 14th, 2002, 04:27 PM
I personally like pwaring's idea better. Conformation popup box would make you verify that is what you wanted to do.... Changing the points you have already assigned would get really anoying. I can see people giving a stupid post positives just so more people would give it negatives, then change their assignment a few hours later....
\"Ignorance is bliss....
but only for your enemy\"
June 14th, 2002, 05:28 PM
Balance is the key.
Originally posted here by JRoc
I think it is a great idea!
This desearved greenies why?
It is better to be HATED for who you are, than LOVED for who you are NOT.
THC/IP Version 4.2
June 14th, 2002, 07:49 PM
Thanks for the support michael and souleman, the simple ideas are always the best it seems.
Dr Toker: I haven't a clue what is happening with JRoc, his antipoints jump up and down so fast I can't keep track of them. One minute he's got lots of greenies after being hammered by FocMaester, the next he's got lots of negatives, then positives, and back to negatives again!
June 22nd, 2002, 09:18 AM
Unfortunately, our algorithms are way too complex and dynamic to allow us to "back out" the data necessary to allow a user to change an assignment that a user has given.
I did, however, implement a spin-off of pwaring's suggestion.
Thanks for the suggestions everyone!