Distributed.net cracks RC5-64
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Distributed.net cracks RC5-64

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001

    Exclamation Distributed.net cracks RC5-64

    don't know if this is *new* news, I didn't know b4 today and thought I'd share. (time 2 reconfigure your clients!)
    /me exits .. ciao 4 now


    distributed.net completes [glowpurple]rc5-64[/glowpurple] project (list announcement)
    september 25, 2002
    [shadow]RC5-64 HAS BEEN SOLVED![/shadow]
    On 14-Jul-2002, a relatively characterless PIII-450 in Tokyo returned the winning key to the distributed.net keyservers. The key 0x63DE7DC154F4D03 produces the plaintext output:

    The unknown message is: some things are better left unread


    Unfortunately, due to breakage in scripts (dbaker's fault, naturally) on the keymaster, this successful submission was not automatically detected. It sat undiscovered until 12-Aug-2002. The key was immediately submitted to RSA Labs and was verified as the winning key.

    So, after 1,757 days and 58,747,597,657 work units tested the winning key was found! While it's debatable that the duration of this project does much to devalue the security of a 64-bit RC5 key by much, we can say with confidence that RC5-64 is not an appropriate algorithm to use for data that will still be sensitive in more than several years' time. On the distributed computing front, however, the RC5-64 project clearly demonstrates the viability of long-term, volunteer-driven, internet-based collaborative efforts. The next time someone bemoans the public's short attention span or need for instant gratification you should remind them what 331,252 people were able to accomplish by joining together and working for nearly five years. distributed.net's RC5-64 project clearly shows that even the most ambitious projects can be completed by volunteers thanks to the combined power of the internet and distributed computing.

    Ignoring artificially high numbers resulting from network difficulties, we completed 86,950,894 workunits on our best day. This is 0.12% of the total keyspace meaning that at our peak rate we could expect to exhaust the keyspace in 790 days. Our peak rate of 270,147,024 kkeys/sec is equivalent to 32,504 800MHz Apple PowerBook G4 laptops or 45,998 2GHz AMD Athlon XP machines or (to use some rc5-56 numbers) nearly a half million Pentium Pro 200s.

    Over the course of the RC5-64 project, 331,252 individuals participated. We tested 15,769,938,165,961,326,592 keys.

    We apologize for the latency in the announcement, but scheduling conflicts with RSA Laboratories and difficulties in reaching the winning participant (who has asked to remain anonymous) introduced the additional delay to the process.

    Also, please consider joining us on SlashNET IRC on Saturday 28-Sep-2002 @ 21:00 UTC (5:00PM EDT) for an online Q+A session on the RC5-64 project and the future plans for the distributed.net network. Not only are we looking forward to moving on to RC5-72 but we're currently reshaping the framework of the dnetc architecture to better accommodate additional projects. We're hoping to attract some new and motivated partners with good ideas and a need for cycles.

    Thanks to RSA Labs for continuing to offer challenges that reward distributed efforts!
    [glowpurple]manually editing your config files can break them. If this happens, you get to keep both pieces. [/glowpurple]

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Wow, that's great. I just got fifteen new PCs set up for it yesterday, too, so I guess I need to reconfigure them.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2001

    Re: Distributed.net cracks RC5-64

    Originally posted here by jcdux Our peak rate of 270,147,024 kkeys/sec is equivalent to 32,504 800MHz Apple PowerBook G4 laptops or 45,998 2GHz AMD Athlon XP machines or (to use some rc5-56 numbers) nearly a half million Pentium Pro 200s.
    Someone pro-Mac had to point to those numbers, and . (Not that I have 32,504 TiBook 800MHz, I wonder how many Dual-G4 1.24 GHz it would take..., not that I can afford them )

    But I need ! So I don't want to start an Anti-Mac Rally in here.

    Later chaps,

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts