Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Remotely Counting Machines Behind NAT

  1. #1
    AO übergeek phishphreek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002

    Remotely Counting Machines Behind NAT

    I did a quick search for this and I didn't see anything on AO... so check this out!!!

    Taken from www.slashdot.org
    Remotely Counting Machines Behind A NAT Box
    Posted by timothy on Wednesday February 05, @04:40PM
    from the you-knew-this-was-coming dept.
    Overtone writes "Steve Bellovin of AT&T Labs Research has published a paper showing how to remotely count the number of machines hiding behind a NAT box (in IMW 2002, the Second Internet Measurement Workshop ). Your friendly DSL or cable broadband provider could implement this technique to enforce their single-machine license clause. Bellovin explains how to change the NAT software to defeat the measurement scheme, but the fix is complicated and unlikely to appear in commercial home gateways anytime soon."
    The PDF is here.

    It def. makes for some interesting reading. This could be some very bad news.

    I would consider this a invasion of privacy. It is my business how I use the bandwith that I "rent".
    Who is to say that I only have one PC that has web access and the rest are for other purposes? What a crock of you know what!

    This also has a negative impact on network security too.
    This technique can make it easier for an attacker to enumerate your network... amongst other things.
    Quitmzilla is a firefox extension that gives you stats on how long you have quit smoking, how much money you\'ve saved, how much you haven\'t smoked and recent milestones. Very helpful for people who quit smoking and used to smoke at their computers... Helps out with the urges.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    i dont think its going to be 'considered` an invasion of privacy by the courts any more than the cable company measuring the number of tvs you have receiving their programming is. which is all the more reason we should learn all we can about it. if it can make them more money we can be sure its going to be used.

    Bukhari:V3B48N826 “The Prophet said, ‘Isn’t the witness of a woman equal to half of that of a man?’ The women said, ‘Yes.’ He said, ‘This is because of the deficiency of a woman’s mind.’”

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    I was actually reading this doco today, and found it interesting, butI dont know how feasible it would be.

    How do you distinguish between 1 user opening multiple sessions?
    What about people behind proxies, can they be counted?

    Never-the-less, good reading...

    [glowpurple]There were so many fewer questions when the stars where still just the holes to heaven - JJ[/glowpurple] [gloworange]I sure could use a vacation from this bull$hit, three ringed circus side show of freaks. - Tool. [/gloworange]

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    it's not an "invasion of privacy" if you happen to have signed an agreement that you won't share your connection with more than one computer. Which is a clause alot of ISP's HAD in the past, not so much now, but it had been a valid concern in the past.

    It might also help ISP's to tailor their service to people if they know that ALL of their customers have multiple pc's they might give special deals on hardware or services.

    It's also useful in mapping the internet... but who knows what may come from this. Of course it also won't be long before someone comes up with a kernel or driver patch for linux that fixes this.. but i'm guessing all you router users are hosed.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts