Slammer gets wired
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Slammer gets wired

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    4,786

    Slammer gets wired

    In it's July issue, Wired Magazine published the full source code for the "Slammer" Internet Worm.

    Wired's position on this discloser:

    =+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+

    "We believe in security, not obscurity. We are fully behind those in the security community. And that means you shine a light upon the vulnerabilities and risks, you don't gloss it over and pretend it doesn't exist," says Blaise Zerega, managing editor of Wired...

    ..."The people who are in a position to attack the Internet and create viruses do not turn to Wired magazine for that kind of information. The people who are in a position to safeguard the Internet and defend against this sort of thing do turn to Wired magazine to read up on important issues like this," contends Zerega.

    =+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+


    I don't know about others here but I do nott turn to Wired to stay on top of security issues. The very nature or a RT magazine makes the information outdated.

    I believe that the people that could help secure the internet already have this information. They know where to look. As do current virus writers. Those that would like to reek havoc but don't know how or where to look yet are the only ones that this information would be useful to. And although I believe in full disclosure the person that does the disclosing (IMO) should have some claim to do so. (e.g., be among the first to capture it in the wild.)

    Now the question I'd like to raise here is:

    Will this type of article help or hinder the case for full disclosure and is Wired acting in an ethical way?



    Quotes taken from: http://www.informationweek.com/story...cleID=10300664
    Bukhari:V3B48N826 “The Prophet said, ‘Isn’t the witness of a woman equal to half of that of a man?’ The women said, ‘Yes.’ He said, ‘This is because of the deficiency of a woman’s mind.’”

  2. #2
    Priapistic Monk KorpDeath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    2,628
    I concur whole heartedly. It sounds to me like Wired wants some unjust publicity from publishing a "controversial" subject.

    My question is, since when was Wired magazine a resource for anything other than fluff? I do read it from time to time, but I certainly don't gain ANY security insight from it.

    I don't think it's directly unethical, but it does set a dangerous precedent. IMO.
    Mankind have a great aversion to intellectual labor; but even supposing knowledge to be easily attainable, more people would be content to be ignorant than would take even a little trouble to acquire it.
    - Samuel Johnson

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    594
    Tedob1's question:... you asked whether or not Wired was acting in an ethical way... whose to say they are or aren't... they're revealing information, information that belongs to the world. I on one hand, completely support them in doing so. Why does everyone have the notion that we have to cover up the bad things.... we should dig into them and learn more from them... I agree it will teach some young guns the wrong things but that's life for you... not everything is perfect.

    As for Wired... I hardly ever touch that publication, even more so, I find most magazines that write about technology a lil' iffy (odd) and useless, so I stay away from them.

    BTW, another thread already exists about this:
    http://www.antionline.com/showthread...t=slammer+code

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    500
    all information should be accessable by everyone. Lots of source that is published on the web is pulled just hours later, as is the case right now with Waste. I dont think they are specifically doing this for publisity, although they will get some of that, they are doing it because they can, and should be able to for that matter. It's freedom of information, and freedom of press. More then that, it's interesting. I for one would like to see how it did what it did so quickly. Just my opinion...
    Ron Paul: Hope for America
    http://www.ronpaul2008.com/

  5. #5
    AO übergeek phishphreek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    4,324
    Will this type of article help or hinder the case for full disclosure and is Wired acting in an ethical way?
    IMO:

    I think it will help if anything. It will make your average Joe/Jane User more aware of the problem at hand and maybe he/she might want to help solve some of these problems. The door can swing both ways though...

    If you really think about it... those who want to cause trouble won't be looking to wired for reference... They already know where to find all the info they need. Suscribe to a couple of security mailing lists (where vuln reports and exploits are mailed out daily) or they can join an "underground" community or search "underground" sites.

    Your average Joe/Jane user can barley run a computer or is just up enough with technology not to fall behind... they aren't these master programmers who know the ins and outs of networking, operating systems, applications and they don't necessarily know which type of attack(s) will have the most impact.

    all information should be accessable by everyone.
    Thats the way I'm thinking about it. This info can be used for good or bad. Put it out there and hope for the best.

    At least you know you'll have job security forver...
    Quitmzilla is a firefox extension that gives you stats on how long you have quit smoking, how much money you\'ve saved, how much you haven\'t smoked and recent milestones. Very helpful for people who quit smoking and used to smoke at their computers... Helps out with the urges.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •