Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 24

Thread: Ethernet switching in a nut shell

  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    274
    Hatebreed: Where have I been? Oh my God I've been up to my eyeballs in busy!!! The only reason I had the time to write this little tutorial is because I got up in the middle of the night to feed the baby and started hammering away before going back to bed. I'm going to try to do a little more in the next few days, and expand on some of the finer nuances of switching. We'll see though. I've been promising friends I'd get some pictures of the baby posted for almost three weeks and have I done it? Nope!

  2. #12
    AntiOnline Senior Member souleman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Flint, MI
    Posts
    2,883
    TK> are you in my masters class? We just covered that about 2 weeks ago It's an online school, so i guess its possible that you are in there also. If you are working at getting a masters through an online program that is.
    \"Ignorance is bliss....
    but only for your enemy\"
    -- souleman

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    274
    Nope, not me. I guess I would need a bachelor's before I started working on my masters. heh....

    I'm just an infrastructure/WAN engineer for a medium sized enterprise. I've been working with switches since they cost ten grand for 8 ports of 10mb. There was a time when (except for the pain it was to install) I was sure that token ring would take over the world and ethernet was just a fad...... Shows how much I know.

  4. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    1,027
    Originally posted here by dcongram
    Important subset to the (great) info from thread_killer.

    1. Switches are a treated as a single collision domain

    Remember the old 3-4-5 rule ?
    Detailing on TK's link on this, switches use store-and-forward tech, enabling simultanious access, thus propagation delay is less/not of a concern anymore...

    Besides, building/having a large layer 2 only network is network managment suicide (single broadcast domain, segmentation...).

    Edit: hum, re-reading myself, I'm not sure I make much sense.. oh well!

    Ammo
    Credit travels up, blame travels down -- The Boss

  5. #15
    AntiOnline Senior Member souleman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Flint, MI
    Posts
    2,883
    TK> I just thought the timing was funny...

    ammo> not all switches use store&foreward... some (most) use cut-through. Store & foreward is basically on high end enterprise switches. cut-through is on most of the switches that people buy for home use. Then there is a hybrid that is used in midrange switches.
    \"Ignorance is bliss....
    but only for your enemy\"
    -- souleman

  6. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    1,027
    Well, out of the 3 most popular "home switches" makers (linksys, d-link, netgear) I've checked-out, all 3 use store-and-forward even on their smallest models...

    The low/midrange stackable managed d-link switches (des-3624) I use at work are also store-and-forward and so is my core switch, a cisco catalyst-3550...

    Granted this is all relatively recent equipment (less than 3 years), but I wouldn't say most switches are still cut-through...

    Ammo
    Credit travels up, blame travels down -- The Boss

  7. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    64

    Re: Ethernet switching in a nut shell

    Originally posted here by thread_killer
    If anyone is interested, I'd be happy to do more on layer 4-7 switching and/or spanning tree.
    Yes Please!
    Dain Bramaged

  8. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    274
    Ok, I'll get to another tutorial. It won't be today though, *maybe* tomorrow if there aren't too many fires to put out.

    tk

  9. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    64
    For a good tutorial, I am willing to wait thank you for all your work tk.
    Dain Bramaged

  10. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    111
    Thanks for the effort thread_killer...looking forward to more tutorials from you in the future.
    Carrie: Someone\'s definition of what constitutes cheating is in direct proportion to how much they themselves want to cheat.
    Miranda: That\'s moral relativism!
    Carrie: I prefer to think of it as quantum cheating.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •