KT400 and KT400A...?
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: KT400 and KT400A...?

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    217

    Cool KT400 and KT400A...?

    Hi all, Can somebody explain to me what the different between KT400 chipset and KT400A chipset, which one is better?

    JohnHACK.......

  2. #2
    BIOS Bomber
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    357
    Hope this helps you out a bit. I did a search and found this:

    http://search.yahoo.com/bin/search?p...0a%22&ei=UTF-8

    There seems to be alot there so hope you find what your looking for
    "When in doubt, use Brute Force."

    Never argue with an idiot. They'll drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    83
    usually with VIA chipsets the "a" version is a more advanced version of the regualr chpset and offers better performance. Although the KT400A has good performance it still is bested by the NForce 2 which is the best AMD chipset available right now.

  4. #4
    Leftie Linux Lover the_JinX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Beverwijk Netherlands
    Posts
    2,535
    The Nforce might be better then the VIA,
    but I'd still go for the VIA, it's just too bad the Nforce chipset is not supported (well) by linux nor bsd !!
    ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI.
    When in Russia, pet a PETSCII.

    Get your ass over to SLAYRadio the best station for C64 Remixes !

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •