My dad is mr. legal and hates to pirate software, and he doesn't want to spend "a lot extra" on kaspersky, because he buys licenses for all of our pcs (4). He thinks that norton ( ) is sufficient in protecting our computers/network from virii. I'm behind an NAT router and do regular av/windows updates. He told me to get some proof that kav is THAT much better than nav. I want to show him that nav is next to worthless, and takes little to no effort to get anything past it. I'd appreciate if you people could enlighten him a bit
(I'm going to print this and show it to him, he told me to find info from "real people" because reviews aren't "accurate".)

FYI: I'm using nav2k2 now and we're going to upgrade soon (hopefully kav)