wire less or with wires - Page 2

View Poll Results: Well which one?

Voters
111. You may not vote on this poll
  • Stick with what you got

    3 2.70%
  • The Angel gets my Vote

    3 2.70%
  • That eye rawks!!

    0 0%
  • The grey eye is cool!!!

    0 0%
  • The mask - def the Mask

    1 0.90%
  • Something simple - just the V

    0 0%
  • WTF do I care???

    2 1.80%
  • Ennis naked, I\'m in love with him seriously.

    102 91.89%
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: wire less or with wires

  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    217
    All depends on

    1 how much you are willing to spend. wireless tends to cost more bcos of the equipment. wired doesnt cost so much even if cabling is involved.
    2 which parts of the house are you gonna be when you want to connect to the network. if not that many places then wiring up wouldnt be a problem. if you need access at lots of places eg toilet...LOL then you might need wireless
    3 do you mind running cables around the house. the wife/mother might mind. also back to Q1
    4 how particular are you about security. with wired, someone has to phsically tap into your network thru somewhere there are cables running. with wireless they can wardrive and might be able to get into the network
    5 your house itself...some homes have problems with reception at certain areas. this can be solved by adding more APs..but then we come back to Q1. also there is a problem with interference with wireless.

    I hope this helps make your decision easier. As for which standard to use if u decide to get wireless. u can make up ur mind later once you decided on wireless or wired. If you can I recommend trying out wireless by borrowing it from a friend or some stores will loan a set to you to test.

  2. #12
    GreekGoddess
    Guest
    I have a wireless network set up here and it's absolutely great, especially since I'm the type of person who likes to move things around a lot. I've only had one major issue in the past, which was a hardware fault and Linksys was quick to replace it. All in all, I spent around $300.00 to set it all up (802.11b at 11 Mbps) with my cable connection (since I decided on going with two USB adapters - one due to a warranty on one of my boxes against modification of any sort) a little pricey, but I love it. I've never had any problems with my signals, even with my farthest box being in the basement, nor have I had any interference problems with cell phones, microwaves, etc.. I can't imagine with my setup having to wire everything, it would be a nightmare. No thanks.

  3. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    20
    wireless lan is great ,if you have a labtop and u need to move here and there
    you need not to be worry about the connection cables
    and it has good data rates.
    but i wonder if it has any bad effects on health

  4. #14
    Senior Member Syini666's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    551
    modafar > you point out something very interesting about the impact of wifi on physical health. I googled around to see what i could turn up. It seems no one has found any real links to health issues stemming from wifi, most likely because its only been around the past couple of years, and long term problems could surface years down the road.
    You're not your post count, You're not your avatar or sig, You're not how fast your internet connection is, You are not your processor, hard drive, or graphics card. You're the all-singing, all-dancing crap of AO
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0

  5. #15
    For a simple home network, i dont think security is a priority. i STILL prefer wires because they are reliable and usually when something goes wrong, it could only be a few things. it is cheaper, and generally 'less messy' in the long run. this is all provided you can tuck your cables away nice and tightly :P

    however, if you go wireless, it means needing adapters for computers, more setting up (when you still have wire lan) and if something DOES go wrong, it can be ANYthing...

    everything everyone has said is by personal preference of couse

    Nutshell > wireless = $$
    010000100111100101110100011001010010
    000001001101011001010010000100100001

    http://www.antionline.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=249524

  6. #16
    AntiOnline Senior Member souleman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Flint, MI
    Posts
    2,884
    a = 54
    b= 11
    g = 54 but you can run b on a g network also.

    If you already have the wires, stick with them. Its faster and cheaper. If you get to the point when you need to run wires to set up another computer, then consider going wireless.

    Oh yeah, and there have been many times in my travels that I have borrowed peoples home networks to connect to the internet because they were not secured properly.
    \"Ignorance is bliss....
    but only for your enemy\"
    -- souleman

  7. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    107
    Well i guess I will keep my wireless for the time being............... but I will cross over next yaer I think ... 10x every 1

  8. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    300
    I have set up both and wireless it nice I like it because it is simple and you don't need a wire to hang from your ceiling! However, I like the security of a lan connection.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

 Security News

     Patches

       Security Trends

         How-To

           Buying Guides