MS looks to Linux for next OS
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: MS looks to Linux for next OS

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    325

    Cool MS looks to Linux for next OS

    It is ironic MS is looking to Linux for the next release of windows:

    "They have been studying Linux extensively. Part of their study has been on how Linux has been able to maintain a high level of consistency in the kernel while groups around it maintain maximum flexibility,"
    http://www.itworld.com/Comp/2444/031216msunit/

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    748
    I would think that a key strength of any company is knowing your competitors inside and out. Having a unit in your business that does nothing except for look at how other companies in your sector do things well is very common. That is something that you learn in any basic management course.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    813
    If MS integrates any form of techniques which are featured within Linux things'll get really nasty Of course, they know not to do that, but from theory to practice
    /\\

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    319
    I'd like to see how they would copy protect it.

  5. #5
    AO übergeek phishphreek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    4,325
    When has m$ not looked to linux for such things? Just this time, they are being "open" about it.

    An example off the top of my head... the side bar that they are including with the new loghorn.

    I had thought I read about them including the multiple (virtual) desktops too, like linux has.
    Ah, yes... here it is.
    http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,109165,00.asp

    For some screen shots... check out:

    http://www.winsupersite.com/showcase...orn_4029_2.asp

    m$ just tends to make things a bit more flashy. They get the 'oohhs and ahhhs' out of people that way, but take up way more space and resources than necessary.

    I'd like to see them come up with an option that you can boot only to a command prompt with the server and config it like you can with linux. No need for a GUI when you can do things via CLI and you save a crap load of resources by not booting to it.

    Looks like they are looking to *nix for better security features too...

    As far a the copy protect... they'll probably do the same thing as they are doing now, but with more copy protecting features.
    They are big on DRM. That's not going to change... just get worse.

    But... this is all my opinion... I'm no expert.
    Quitmzilla is a firefox extension that gives you stats on how long you have quit smoking, how much money you\'ve saved, how much you haven\'t smoked and recent milestones. Very helpful for people who quit smoking and used to smoke at their computers... Helps out with the urges.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    744
    Call me an idiot but what I got out of that article was that MS is looking for company structuring help by looking at *nix development. The whole open source community is extensive, yet they still put out quality products and maintain them much better. Maybe MS has finally figured out their small teams of seperate developers, working in the dark of each other, can be counterproductive and an 'open' model of development, where all employees get to view the whole could be boon for Longhorn.
    Every now and then, one of you won't annoy me.

  7. #7
    Regal Making Handler
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    1,668
    I doubt that i think they will be looking for a weakness to exploit.
    What happens if a big asteroid hits the Earth? Judging from realistic simulations involving a sledge hammer and a common laboratory frog, we can assume it will be pretty bad. - Dave Barry

  8. #8
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    18
    microsoft of course wants that when it rolls out the new windows version codenamed 'Longhorn' , it should be able to meet the demands of the industry: stability and security of the OS. and what would be the best strategy then but to study LINUX - how developers were able to protect the core kernel of it while maintaining it flexibility?

    for a big company such as Microsoft that's the logical thing to do.
    Turn on. Tune in. Drop out.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    813
    And like this, by the end of the first year of production of Longhorn, most people would think MS introduced multiple desktops in their OS and GNU/Linux just copied it. Wankers!
    /\\

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    394
    As usualy......, lets look in history:

    http://members.fortunecity.com/pcmuseum/dos.htm
    That was in the begining. Microsoft got ms-dos.

    Atfer that was apple that makes first grafic desktop.
    Microsoft used it.

    ......and more and more..... like this....

    what will be next? will windows be free like linux? hehe
    // too far away outside of limit

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •