-
January 28th, 2004 04:03 PM
#11
Member
In tcp/ip loopback is a separate entity from your actual IP address, try connecting to your actual address instead of the loopback as its slightly more realistic simulation of a remote attack. You can't really simulate a lot of attacks using this method though, plus it's too easy to accidentally use your access to the box to do stuff you couldn't normally do remotely.
[gloworange]
find /home/$newbie -name *? | www.google.com 2>/dev/null
[/gloworange]
-
January 28th, 2004 04:15 PM
#12
:q :q! :wq :w :w! :wq! :quit :quit! :help help helpquit quit quithelp :quitplease :quitnow :leave :**** ^X^C ^C ^D ^Z ^Q QUITDAMMIT ^[:wq GCS,M);d@;p;c++;l++;u ++ ;e+ ;m++(---) ;s+/+ ;n- ;h* ;f+(--) ;!g ;w+(-) ;t- ;r+(-) ;y+(**)
-
January 28th, 2004 04:27 PM
#13
Member
Not really. THe first part was referring to using own address e.g. 172.16.2 instead of the loopback 127.0.0.1 in local pen testing which you didn't mention, and the second part was elaborating on some examples of why it doesn't work as well to test locally.
[gloworange]
find /home/$newbie -name *? | www.google.com 2>/dev/null
[/gloworange]
-
January 29th, 2004 04:20 PM
#14
sorry, you're right, I had been awake for 36 hours when i posted last, I was delerious. I'm good now, though, I slept 14 hours yesterday.
:q :q! :wq :w :w! :wq! :quit :quit! :help help helpquit quit quithelp :quitplease :quitnow :leave :**** ^X^C ^C ^D ^Z ^Q QUITDAMMIT ^[:wq GCS,M);d@;p;c++;l++;u ++ ;e+ ;m++(---) ;s+/+ ;n- ;h* ;f+(--) ;!g ;w+(-) ;t- ;r+(-) ;y+(**)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
|
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks