February 7th, 2004 06:12 AM
Cybr1d, I believe I know why negative points may be assigned unjustly here, which gives me a chance to bring up one point about this system I really don't agree with. If you assign "too many" positive AntiPoints (as I have), you get a warning saying that you need to assign more negative points in order to achieve balance. I'll bet you that's what's going on. Why is that? Most posts I read are positive, so it's really unfair to try to force me to pick ones to down on.
So this is a really interesting discussion going on here. So, you guys who are the Jedi of AntiOnline -- Is my Trillian idea valid? Would that remedy any possible security holes, or be pointless? I'm just really curious on that (and will be amazed if one of my ideas ACTUALLY works! Ha!).
February 7th, 2004 07:16 AM
You can also check out this tool from Merijn - http://www.spywareinfo.com/~merijn/f...tartuplist.zip
It's a lot more thorough than msconfig, and will display the quiet processes, as well as other useful information.
February 7th, 2004 10:06 AM
Whilst you are on the site that Norrisk suggests, pick up a copy of "HijackThis" another good free tool, and you can never have enough security tools?
Phishphreak...................do you realise that just about every US combat plane since the Korean war has had a British HUD..............and who is building the "stick and throttle" assembly for the JSF? So hacking a webcam is well within our capabilities.
Jinxy.......that was a beta prototype I gave you.....you should not have tried it in combat!
If you cannot do someone any good: don't do them any harm....
As long as you did this to one of these, the least of my little ones............you did it unto Me.
What profiteth a man if he gains the entire World at the expense of his immortal soul?
February 7th, 2004 12:43 PM