The Next Court Case: Googol Vs. Google?
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: The Next Court Case: Googol Vs. Google?

  1. #1
    Macht Nicht Aus moxnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Huson Mt.
    Posts
    1,752

    The Next Court Case: Googol Vs. Google?

    Good grief....whats next....bloody sue crazy people.
    The family of the mathematician who coined the word "googol" may be threatening to take Google.com to court over the name, according to an article in Wednesday's edition of The Scotsman.

    Professor Edward Kasner, a mathematician at Columbia University, used the term "googol" in his 1940 book, Mathematics and the Imagination to mean 10 raised to the 100th power. According to mathematical lore, he got the word from his 9-year-old nephew. His great-neice, Peri Fleisher, is seriously looking at asserting the family's legal rights, according to the article. In an interview by the Baltimore Sun, Fleisher is described as "a compensation specialist for a Silicon Valley firm".


    Legal experts consulted by The Scotsman asserted that it would be difficult to prove the family had any legitimate claim to use of the word, unless they had been using it as a trademark or somehow that Google.com had been misusing the term for their own benefit.
    Source
    \"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, Champagne in one hand - strawberries in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming WOO HOO - What a Ride!\"
    Author Unknown

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,019
    If that's the case, then whoever coined the word "hear" owes some money to the guy who came up with "here", same goes for "sea" and "see"...

    Disgusting.....

  3. #3
    AO Soccer Mom debwalin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    2,185
    Personally I don't see how they have a leg to stand on. Not spelled the same, not used for some obscure mathematical theorem, nothing is the same, except phonetically is sounds the same. I'm with groovicious on this one, read/read, hear/hear, sea/see, there/their/they're, you're/your....The world is full of words that sound the same, but have completely different meanings. This is just another case, IMO.
    Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    620
    What.. Did the guy get the word copyrighted or something?

    It's sort of like that whole Lindows thing with Microsoft. They think that they own anything ending in "indows"

    I say.. who cares? It's just a name for god's sake!

    They're probably just trying to find some extra cash to pay the credit card debt.

    mjk

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,019
    there/their/they're
    dang, that was the other combination I was trying to think of.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Raion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    New York, New York
    Posts
    1,299
    Why do you think he waited so long to mention this? How long has google been around??
    WARNING: THIS SIGNATURE IS SHAREWARE PLEASE REGISTER THIS SIGNATURE BY SENDING ME MONEY TO SEE THE COMPLETE SIGNATURE!

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    843
    there/their/they're

    ummm yonder?

    goog-el
    goo-go-el

    not only a difference in spelling but also a bit of a difference in pronunciation. I don't see much of a similarity here.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    107
    huh.. Try searching there.. u get yahoo search results :P
    XNikon
    please don\'t visit www.BusyTalk.com

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •