Phrack 62 out!!

[whizkid2300]

phrack is a nive little place, one of my definate places for reading. The articles tend to be informative, and not beginnger stuff which is definately a plus, to me. (I personally get ****ing tired of reading stuff on a site where 90% of the stuff is either dumied down, or is just basic stuff.)

I definately recommend reading every issue, they might be old but a lot of the stuff still applies now.

Undertaker just take a look at a couple other things on the site. It usually is a good site.

[i2c]

I agree with you Undies, the radio hacking one is diabolical, theres no hacking in there..its basic radio tech..

i2c

[SirDice]

Since I know next to nothing about radio I cannot comment on that perticular article.
But to write off the complete site because 1 article isn't up to par is a bit harsh isn't it?

If you think about it, you might as well write off AO. It also has it's fair share of articles that are crap (how do I hack my girlfriend's hotmail ie.)

But we can all see past that now can't we?

Maybe you should submit a better article on radio hacking for Phrack 63?

[Maestr0]

The article co-authored by Jamie Butler aka Fuzen_Op (Rootkit.Com) "Bypassing 3rd Party Windows Buffer Overflow Protection" is excellent for those interested in NT Kernel hacking.



-Maestr0

[i2c]

I only agreeded on the quality of the radio hacking tutorial the majority of the site is excellent and very technical, phracks a must read.

as for writing a better article on radio hacking, im not real expert i no more than was written there but less that i would expect for a phrack article, ive done some dsp (digital signal processing) with radio signals but nothing that i could call "radio hacking", also i have no desire to write for phrack for various reasons.

i2c