July 23rd, 2004 07:34 PM
win 2000 ???
well you remember all the warez and stuff you could digg up in the web for win 98 & 95 regarding ,well like there was a warz which could locate the dial up and cached p/w and stuff like that you know , but after the introductin of 2000 and the xp family ive hardly seen any of them , can you tell me why. no i dont want them you know i was just curious,that even after lets say 5 yrs of introduction of 2000, ive nevr seen a warz for it
all i wanna know is why , may it is the file system ntfs to fat 32 , or is it the new security feature embedded in 2000 and if it is how does it work , just curious.....
plz don negg me for my curiousity , jut wondering why , no links or files required
July 23rd, 2004 07:38 PM
They still exist. L0phtCrack and Cain&Abel are 2 that I can think of right now.
July 23rd, 2004 07:48 PM
they do , i thought they don't and thats why they call win 2000 more SECURE OS .
July 23rd, 2004 07:55 PM
An OS is as secure as the user can set it to be...windows 98 can become secure if u really want it to be
July 23rd, 2004 07:58 PM
Ha ha, ya it even becomes a more SECURE OS when it's turned off! Try breaking in then!
(kr5kernel at hotmail dot com)
Linux: Making Penguins Cool Since 1994.
July 23rd, 2004 08:02 PM
Ahh the testing day's.. *sighs*
I take serious heart to that My box is stable, reliable, secure, and NICE. I'm in the process of switching firewall's though. /me need's to find that Kerio download link.
windows 98 can become secure if u really want it to be
July 23rd, 2004 08:04 PM
My computer has wake on lan. It can be turned on remotely is what I've been told. Here's a link for security tools that should work on 2000.
When death sleeps it dreams of you...
July 23rd, 2004 08:08 PM
lol Spyder, I use XP on my laptop and PC, but it has NEVER, I repeat NEVER crashed, NEVER done anything I didnt want it to do, and it almost Never runs anything without my permition. I pretty much have only things that I want running on that...nothing extra, nothing less. The same can be done with 98 at an extent.
July 23rd, 2004 08:18 PM
There is no "at an extent" with me.
July 23rd, 2004 08:23 PM
well,well well what do we have here , win 2000,is not secure as i thought it would be ,
as you know, thanx for kiling my curisity .!!