Top AP earners Mods where is the dif?? - Page 2
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 27

Thread: Top AP earners Mods where is the dif??

  1. #11
    Flash M0nkey
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    3,447
    Ohhhh, you mean so we can all watch **** threads stay open because Neg and MsMittens, being human, do have to put the computer down to take a **** once in a while?
    yup yup i know where your com,ing from - but all it would take is to have a limit where a thread must recieve negs from at least 4 people and recieve over X number of negs in total to be closed

    that way a top earner can easily provide the number of points needed to close a thread but their decision must be supported by a min of 3 other people....newbies, seniors doesn't matter who all that matters is that some other people from community also agree that thread is shite and should be closed which shouldn't be hard to get

    v_L

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    519
    yeah that is a good idea val .. that way one person who dislikes a thread cant shut it down unless it is a mutual decision by at least a small group .. i like that idea

  3. #13
    AO Ancient: Team Leader
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    5,197
    Gore makes a good point. Over time those top AP earners have been put there by the rest of the community. Looking at the top 10 list there isn't really anyone there that is an utter moron and lacking some judgement. So look at the top ten as your elected officials... You voted them in and they can make decisions. If the decision means that the thread closes it's usually going to close after a couple more people read it anyway, we're just putting it out of it's misery.

    Spyder: There is no way you can close a thread all on your lonesome. There has to have been negative input previously even though it may no show on the little bar by others. I can be pretty safe saying this because I have, within minutes of a post being published, negged the little brat who wrote it and even in sec related forums I can't close the thread. Remember that people without AP's can neg someone and it won't show to you or me but the negs are recorded against the person and the thread.
    Don\'t SYN us.... We\'ll SYN you.....
    \"A nation that draws too broad a difference between its scholars and its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards, and its fighting done by fools.\" - Thucydides

  4. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    519
    Tiger Shark if say 4 or 5 people have posted in the thread and spyder negs all of them it will close, isnt that what you meant spyder?

  5. #15
    Super Moderator: GMT Zone nihil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    United Kingdom: Bridlington
    Posts
    17,190
    I see it rather differently:

    1. The problem is not lame threads, it is lamers posting to them. I say leave them open so everyone gets a shot at the lamers, not the thread.

    2. A reasonable thread can be destroyed by a troll whose getting negged closes the thread. A classic example of automation being inferior to human judgement.

    3. Sure, the antipoints is an indication of consensus.............but the rules have changed at least twice whilst I have been here, so it is hardly the level playing field that I would call democracy.

    4. I notice that moderators close threads that quite deserve to be negged some more, before the perpertrators have been banned.

    5. Does it happen that often to be a real problem?...............no, I do not believe so, and would be interested to see evidence to the contrary. I certainly do not think that it merits major resource investment.

    I would suggest that the simplest solution is to increase the threshold for closing a thread automatically. That would allow more people to express an opinion, protect threads that have been subjected to "troll attack" and prevent any single individual from having too much influence on a particular thread, whilst still being able to give full expression to their opinions. [OK, the splitting of antipoints has helped a lot here, already, but sometimes a troll deserves the "kill" setting]

    The main advantage of this suggestion is that it is a very simple coding change.

    Just my thoughts
    If you cannot do someone any good: don't do them any harm....
    As long as you did this to one of these, the least of my little ones............you did it unto Me.
    What profiteth a man if he gains the entire World at the expense of his immortal soul?

  6. #16
    King Arana: Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    4,055
    Tiger: I'm saying I can if I wanted to, easily actually. However I wouldn't and somewhat couldn't because that would mean negging people just for being in the thread. I couldn't hit one person and close the thread, I'd have to neg about 4-6 people in the thread. And that's unjust, unless they posted a post deserving of a neg as well (which is usually not the case).

    EDIT:
    Tiger Shark if say 4 or 5 people have posted in the thread and spyder negs all of them it will close, isnt that what you meant spyder?
    Yes, that's exactly what I meant.
    Space For Rent.. =]

  7. #17
    er0k
    Guest
    i think the mods now do a good enough job.. they do more than just close threads

  8. #18
    Just a Virtualized Geek MrLinus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Redondo Beach, CA
    Posts
    7,324
    Ya. We even respond to some..
    Goodbye, Mittens (1992-2008). My pillow will be cold without your purring beside my head
    Extra! Extra! Get your FREE copy of Insight Newsletter||MsMittens' HomePage

  9. #19
    Super Moderator
    Know-it-All Master Beaver

    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    3,914
    Hey Hey,

    The thing to remember is that the mods can reopen a suicidal thread if need be... So I go on a rampage and neg everyone in the thread.... or myself and, say, gore neg someone and it goes suicidal... The negged posts can be removed and the thread reopened.... I don't think it happens often enough to warrant changes to the systems.... If you think a thread has been closed unfairly or improperly... it may have happened for reasons you don't know.. but if you have a problem with it being closed... it's a valid discussion or something like that... send a mod a PM and ask them to look at it.

    Peace,
    HT
    IT Blog: .:Computer Defense:.
    PnCHd (Pronounced Pinched): Acronym - Point 'n Click Hacked. As in: "That website was pinched" or "The skiddie pinched my computer because I forgot to patch".

  10. #20
    AO BOFH: Luser Abuser BModeratorFH gore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    7,177
    For the record. If I see a thread that's really good and a dumb add posting in it who needs some red, I will greenie someone in that thread who deserves it (If the thread is worth keeping open, someone deserves green) and then I will neg the person so it will stay open. I have to, I negged a roll call post and it went suicidal.
    Kill the lights, let the candles burn behind the pumpkins’ mischievous grins, and let the skeletons dance. For one thing is certain, The Misfits have returned and once again everyday is Halloween.The Misfits FreeBSD
    Cannibal Holocaust
    SuSE Linux
    Slackware Linux

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

 Security News

     Patches

       Security Trends

         How-To

           Buying Guides