-
October 17th, 2004, 07:09 PM
#1
Junior Member
Alternate Data Streams - is HFS vulnerable too?
I've been reading a lot about ADS as of late, but I haven't found an answer to this question: Is ADS a vulnerability of HFS as well? Supposedly NTFS uses a rip off of HFS's forking which leaves NTFS vulnerable to ADS attacks, but what about HFS? Is this a problem too?
-
October 18th, 2004, 11:24 AM
#2
Wow, a question about the ancient Hierarchical File System (HFS). Are you referring to the original UNIX version, Macintosh, OS/2, DOS or WinNT? To date, no file (data) streaming vulnerabilities are known to exist in the *original* (UNIX) implementation. The problem with NTFS file streaming is not directly related to the original design of HFS, rather, the bastardized implementation that Microsoft cooked up based on how HFS forking operates.
--TH13
Our scars have the power to remind us that our past was real. -- Hannibal Lecter.
Talent is God given. Be humble. Fame is man-given. Be grateful. Conceit is self-given. Be careful. -- John Wooden
-
October 18th, 2004, 04:42 PM
#3
Junior Member
Ah, thank you. I was under the impression that MacOSX is run on HFS..
-
October 19th, 2004, 02:23 AM
#4
I was under the impression that MacOSX is run on HFS..
It does afaik. But it is journalled.
Fresh on the heels of its "Jaguar" release of Mac OS X 10.2, Apple Computer Inc. is about to spring a new surprise for the Unix-based OS: A journaled file system designed to provide corporate Mac sites with a new, historical view of their data.
Taken from this article: http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,634711,00.asp
What happens if a big asteroid hits the Earth? Judging from realistic simulations involving a sledge hammer and a common laboratory frog, we can assume it will be pretty bad. - Dave Barry
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|