-
September 27th, 2004, 01:38 AM
#1
I'd like to submit a formal complaint about the system
So, if a user is ignoring another user, it prevents the 'ignored' user from participating in a thread that the 'ignorer' is a part of.
This defeats the purpose of having a useful community. If someone being ignored prevents them from participating in threads, I'd have to cast my vote in the box that says "fix this ****, because it's stupid".
I'd suggest that if someone is being ignored, then the ignorer should see said persons post as "hidden". This seems completely fair and reasonable because everyone that is a member here has the right to participate.
Antionline in a nutshell
\"You\'re putting the fate of the world in the hands of a bunch of idiots I wouldn\'t trust with a potato gun\"
Trust your Technolust
-
September 27th, 2004, 01:48 AM
#2
Re: I'd like to submit a formal complaint about the system
I agree. I never knew ignoring could cause this. I always thought it would just display the ignored posts as hidden, like you said.
-
September 27th, 2004, 01:48 AM
#3
That's a damned good idea hogfly! There are like 12 members that would be ignored right now if all it did was hide their posts, but I'm afraid to click "ignore" b/c every now and then an annoying member might start a useful discussion....exactly as you said.
-
September 27th, 2004, 01:51 AM
#4
Heh, happens to me all the time (well, not ALL the time but it has happened to me alot). It sucks too, because I really wanna participate in that discussion/etc as well.
-
September 27th, 2004, 03:02 AM
#5
why isn't this in site suggestions
-
September 27th, 2004, 03:13 AM
#6
I didn't even know this... are you saying that if I would start a thread, and if I would put you on ignore, you wouldn't be able to reply to that thread? And what if someone else starts a thread, and I reply to it and have you on ignore, you wouldn't be able to reply?
I'm sure that that's not how it's supposed to be... I'm moving this to the Bugs forum for mnstrgrl to have a look at...
-
September 27th, 2004, 03:20 AM
#7
Neg, good move. I wasn't sure where to put it because I think it's designed to function that way.
It happens when the thread creator has you on their ignore list.
EX:
chsh couldn't post a response in the forensics forum because he is being ignored by irongeek. He was trying to respond to irongeek and got this message:
The original poster of this topic, Irongeek, has you on their ignore list. You are unable to reply to the threads they start
Antionline in a nutshell
\"You\'re putting the fate of the world in the hands of a bunch of idiots I wouldn\'t trust with a potato gun\"
Trust your Technolust
-
September 27th, 2004, 03:21 AM
#8
Originally posted here by er0k
why isn't this in site suggestions
Simply because I don't think "suggestions" gets paid attention to
Antionline in a nutshell
\"You\'re putting the fate of the world in the hands of a bunch of idiots I wouldn\'t trust with a potato gun\"
Trust your Technolust
-
September 27th, 2004, 03:22 AM
#9
-
September 27th, 2004, 03:23 AM
#10
Edit:
Does this only happen with thread starters? Did IronGeek start the thread chsh tried to reply to but couldn't since he's on IronGeek's ignore list?
I remember reading something about this (back in JP's days)... I'm pretty sure JP did it on purpose. It's always open for discussion, of course, and I guess mnstrgrl could remove it if requested...
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|