March 5th, 2005, 03:42 AM
Why is it that the windows xp shows difference in the size of file and size on disk for some files and not for others?
How is the storage being done and why is the difference in sizes.?
Is there a way to manage storage efficiently beside defragmentation?
\"The Smilie Wars\" ... just arrived after the great crusades
.... computers come to the rescue .... ah technology at last has some use.
March 5th, 2005, 05:02 AM
Q. I'm using Windows XP. When I right-click a file and choose Properties, it shows two different sizes, labeled "size" and "size on disk." Which one should I use when I'm trying to figure out the actual size of a file—and why are there two sizes shown? I'm confused.
A. Your question requires a semi-technical answer, so I'll do my best to respond in a way that won't cause your eyes to glaze over. Caution: Do not continue reading if you are operating heavy machinery! Okay, here goes: Hard drives save data in what are called clusters, and cluster sizes vary. A cluster is comprised of disk sectors, and it's the sectors that you tidy up when you run Disk Defragmenter. When you run Scan Disk, part of what you're checking is the integrity of your clusters. And nobody likes a person with untrustworthy clusters.
For the sake of our example, let's say your hard drive's clusters are 10 kilobytes each in size. And let's say you need to save an 8-kilobyte file. Because clusters aren't shared, your 8-kilobyte file is going to use the entire 10-kilobyte cluster, making it unavailable for other files. So the "size on disk" figure refers to how much space the one file is consuming on your hard drive, based on utilized clusters. If you want to know what the actual data size of the file is, then you'll want to refer to the "size" number. (Anybody still awake?)
"Personality is only ripe when a man has made the truth his own."
-- Søren Kierkegaard