Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: Netstumbler "Vendor: Fake"

  1. #11
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    11
    Originally posted here by Maestr0
    Erm, are you kidding me?Try a whois on 127.0.0.1. OMFG IANA owns my localhost!! lol, seriously they are RFC 1918, of course they are reserved. Does 192.168.x.x ring a bell? And of course the second hop is also a rfc1918 like the first, they are both internal networks. the 10.x.x.x (also rfc1918) is probably the wired network which gets NATed to the internet. On that wired network is a wireless AP, the wireless AP is gets its addy from 10.x.x.x DHCP and then runs its own DHCP on 192.168.x.x, this way the WLAN and LAN are separate. Its not a honeypot its some dude with a linksys AP plugged into his Linksys router.



    -Maestr0
    ah...that makes since...thnx for all the replies...o yea..and i ran port scan on the 10.x.x.x and the only port that was open was port 514 with a service called cmd running(reported by nmap). I tried to telnet to it see if it was the cmd from windows but all i got was a blank screen.

  2. #12
    Leftie Linux Lover the_JinX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Beverwijk Netherlands
    Posts
    2,534
    How about an AP with a spoofed MAC..

    That would make it a Fake vendor ID..
    ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI.
    When in Russia, pet a PETSCII.

    Get your ass over to SLAYRadio the best station for C64 Remixes !

  3. #13
    Senior Member nihil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    United Kingdom: Bridlington
    Posts
    17,188
    Hi Maestr0 ,

    Thanks, I had spotted the first one it was the second 10.x.x.x that had me confused. I didn't even think about wireless.................here in "log cabin country" we don't even have cable TV

    Your explanation makes it all fit now

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •