Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Password standards

  1. #1
    Frustrated Mad Scientist
    Join Date
    Dec 2004

    Password standards

    I'd read abpout half of this before the penny dropped. Too early in the morning

    • Minimum length 8 characters
    • Not in any dictionary.
    • No word or phrase bearing any connection to the holder.
    • Containing no characters in the ASCII character set.
    • No characters typeable on a Sun type 5 keyboard
    • No subset of one character or more must have appeared on Usenet news,
    /dev/mem, rand(3), or the King James bible (version 0.1alpha)
    • Must be quantum theoretically secure, i.e. must automatically change if
    observed (to protect against net sniffing).
    • Binary representation must not contain any of the sequences 00 01 10 11,
    commonly known about in hacker circles.
    • Be provably different from all other passwords on the internet.
    • Not be representable in any human language or written script.
    • Color passwords must use a minimum 32 bit palette.
    • Changed prior to every use.
    • Resistant to revelation under threat of physical violence.
    • Contain tissue samples of at least 3 vital organs.
    • Incontrovertible by OJ Simpson’s lawyers.
    • Undecodable by virtue of application of 0 way hash function.
    • Odorless, silent, invisible, tasteless, weightless, shapeless, lacking
    form and inert.
    • Contain non-linear random S-boxes (without a backdoor).
    • Self-escrowable to enable authorities to capture kiddie-porn people and
    baddies but not the goodies ("but we'll only decode it with a court order, honest").
    • Not decryptable by exhaustive application of possible one time pads.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Cemetric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    So in other words ..

    A Borg assimilated , self distructing , regenarating password of 8 characters with the DNA of a Cameleon and using the alphabet of the Vulcans might be considered a safe password.

    Yeah I think mine is safe ... though might have to find that cameleon first to be sure


    Back when I was a boy, we carved our own IC's out of wood.

  3. #3
    Senior Member DakX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Dang thats a whole list of things. I think mine are safe. A few off them aren't thats for sure. It will be difficult to hold up those standards
    [T]he future is now.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Pacific Northwest
    We can combine those password procedures with biometrics. When using the iris scan if they enter the wrong password on the keyboard, they get a shot of 10% OC (Pepper Spray) or while scanning the finger print of the index, if wrong - a couple of hornet stinks would be in order. And of course other physical attributes and retribution could be utilized to verify the user, but since this is rated "PG" thus far....
    Connection refused, try again later.

  5. #5
    In And Above Man Black Cluster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    You have presented ... more than the steps needed to harden your password and boost its strength ... sticking to these steps can consolidate a great password ....

    However, these steps will generate many phobias and rev up maddness if followed strictly... I don't recommend follwing all of them ....
    \"The only truly secure system is one that is powered off, cast in a block of concrete and sealed in a lead-lined room with armed guards - and even then I have my doubts\".....Spaf
    Everytime I learn a new thing, I discover how ignorant I am.- ... Black Cluster

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts