View Poll Results: Which of the following options contains command parameters of the ls -l *rpm command?
- 6. You may not vote on this poll
August 19th, 2005, 09:49 PM
poll: which firewall distro you use?
Hi all, folks i am curious about the firewall distro you use either at your work or at home. I will like to know about the following questions,
- Are you running any type of proxies on it (squid, dns, pop, smtp and ftp proxy)?
- Is this possible to port forward (from local to internet)?
- Can you use your firewall as nat router?
- Why you choose this distro instead of any other?
- How much easily you can configure it?
- Support for VPN?
any other strong point which forced you to use the distro??
If the distro you are using is not listed here you can mention it.
Waiting to here some good points.
(Edited: to change 'u' to 'you' and 'ur' to 'your')
Excuse me, is there an airport nearby large enough for a private jet to land?
August 19th, 2005, 10:36 PM
First off, www.webster.com
U need 2 clean up ur akt. That is pathetic. You look like a skiddie wannabe who is too ignorant to make a clearly communicated request.
Second...what do you mean by 'distro'? As in, distribution? As in, linux embedded distribution? These all look like open source, GPL'd types of firewall app's. I am not certain, but if I'm right that's not much of a definitive list. Where's the CISCO, Check Point, NetScreen, Juniper, and Sonic Wall firewalls? Are you asking for software firewalls only? Open source software firewalls only? Open source GPL and blessed by his holy grace ERS software firewalls only?
"Data is not necessarily information. Information does not necessarily lead to knowledge. And knowledge is not always sufficient to discover truth and breed wisdom." --Spaf
Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made president should on no account be allowed to do the job. --Douglas Adams (1952-2001)
"...people find it far easier to forgive others for being wrong than being right." - Albus Percival Wulfric Brian Dumbledore
August 19th, 2005, 11:49 PM
Have IPcop, but havent tested/played with it enough to deploy anywhere..
"Consumer technology now exceeds the average persons ability to comprehend how to use it..give up hope of them being able to understand how it works." - Me http://www.cybercrypt.co.nr
August 19th, 2005, 11:59 PM
what zencoder said.
but to answer some questions.
Work = Nokia CheckPoint FW1 NG w/AI
Home = smoothwall
Give a man a match and he will be warm for a while, light him on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life.
August 20th, 2005, 01:38 AM
Home: Computers -> Router (nat) -> Smoothwall -> DSL Modem -> Internet
Been rigged this way for two years and am quite pleased. And just for shitz and grins, Sygate on the Computers.
Connection refused, try again later.
August 20th, 2005, 02:27 AM
August 20th, 2005, 03:32 AM
Work: Sidewinder G2
- Yes, it runs proxies for all of our services.
- Yes, it is possible to port forward
- Yes, it can be perform NAT duties
- Because it offers the required level of assurance for our needs and featured the best fitting ROSI.
- We were able to easily configure it to meet our needs, not sure what you mean beyond that
- Yes, it supports VPN
- It is the fighest assurance firewall appliance on the market
- Yes, it can run proxies
- Yes, it can port forward
- Yes, it can perform NAT duties
- Because it met my needs most exactly
- Yes, it was very easy to configure
- Yes, it supports VPN
- Again, because it met my needs most exatly
August 20th, 2005, 05:49 AM
Currently using Bastille
Edit: using firestarter, forgot it was there... hehe
Computers do not have problems, they have users.
August 20th, 2005, 06:25 AM
Oh Bastille... (which isn't a firewall by the way, it is a suite of OS hardening/reporting tools)
August 20th, 2005, 06:38 AM
IPcop for me, but if you make your own, Catch is right on, bastille is a great set of scripts to point you in the right direction, then try firewall-builder on top and lock it down.
\"If computers are to become smart enough to design their own successors, initiating a process that will lead to God-like omniscience after a number of ever swifter passages from one generation of computers to the next, someone is going to have to write the software that gets the process going, and humans have given absolutely no evidence of being able to write such software.\" -Jaron Lanier