What do you prefer To use as a naming scheme for your network? - Page 2
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: What do you prefer To use as a naming scheme for your network?

  1. #11
    THE Bastard Sys***** dinowuff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Third planet from the Sun
    Posts
    1,250
    Whatever you do, UAnimosity, don't try to be funny. I set up a simple domain for a doctors office and his remote office. I named the domain Human. The servers were named after viruses/diseases, the workstations after organs.

    After all was said and done, a network tech was running through the exchange logs for something and noticed that userx had logged into hiv and was not the primary user. (or something to that effect)

    Anyway, the Doctor was not happy about the server name. I had to rename all the servers and workstations. At least I got to keep the domain name.
    09:F9:11:02:9D:74:E3:5B8:41:56:C5:63:56:88:C0

  2. #12
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    11
    You can use the last two octets of the IP address. Makes it easy and since you have to remember them anyway.....what the heck.

  3. #13
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    11
    interesting naming schemes, especailly that shakespeare one, i thought that was quite well done.

    MOst organizations i know dont really a sense of humour when it comes to their network. they're a buisness enviroment and dont really want humour clouding your tasks.

    Still, it was a nice try.

  4. #14
    Senior Member kr5kernel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    347
    I like famous guitar players, and pink floyd songs. Keeps me chucklin.
    kr5kernel
    (kr5kernel at hotmail dot com)
    Linux: Making Penguins Cool Since 1994.

  5. #15
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    2
    I usually use elements for the workstations (oxygen,nitrogen) and scientists for the servers ( einstein, newton)

  6. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    372
    what we used at my old gov't job was pretty much like what TechGrunt said.

    First two-four are city, second two are state, next three describe the machines function, last three are digits because of how many of each machine we had.

    Example:

    sfcasnf001

    sf = san francisco
    ca = california
    snf = server, novell, file
    001 = the first of these machines in the SF location

    this scaled to huge proportions... the network had over 2 million machines (servers, workstations and "others") on it

    Give a man a match and he will be warm for a while, light him on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life.

  7. #17
    AO Senior Cow-beller
    Moderator
    zencoder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Mountain standard tribe.
    Posts
    1,177
    I've seen many places do exactly what TechGrunt and Lv4 described.

    Star Trek names (Laforge, picard, enterprise, voyager)...then they get into clustered systems...Riker01 Riker02, etc. It get's ugly. Then, you can see the corporate mentailty shift as they start a uniform standard that helps categorize devices and locales.
    UNYCOS001 < Unix, New York, Corporate site, Server #001
    WNYCOW015 < Windows, New York, Corporate site,Workstation #015
    WNYCON095 < Windows, New York, Corporate site, Notebook #095

    While it works, if you know the code, it's ugly. I personally like theme's, such as catch and others have mentioned. Great thinkers, artists, musicians...I have a friend who has the horsemen of the apocalypse on his home network...what ever you like.

    I would prefer not to see smtpmail1, exchange04, oradb, etc. in server names...but using a letter or two to help a group of employees quickly recognize the function is probably fine. It leaves less to the imagination though.
    "Data is not necessarily information. Information does not necessarily lead to knowledge. And knowledge is not always sufficient to discover truth and breed wisdom." --Spaf
    Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made president should on no account be allowed to do the job. --Douglas Adams (1952-2001)
    "...people find it far easier to forgive others for being wrong than being right." - Albus Percival Wulfric Brian Dumbledore

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

 Security News

     Patches

       Security Trends

         How-To

           Buying Guides