-
December 2nd, 2005, 04:18 AM
#1
Senior Member
is it possible to route.....
Is it possibel to route terminal services traffice from a firewall to another firewall? The reason I ask because is a buddy of mine wants to connect his small network from a T1 that is being shared by four businesses, his being one of the businesses. A T1 is coming into a router, next a sonicwall firewall and from there a switch then four linksys routers each hosting their own network. My buddy has terminal services installed on his Win2K server. He wants to connect to the server remotely. I am guessing he has to use the T1's Public address then the firewall would have to route traffic to his linksys router. Is that possible. Sorry but I am kind new to this. Oh yeh can you change connecting ports for terminal services?
-
December 2nd, 2005, 04:22 AM
#2
He would have to talk to the person administering the firewall to arrange that, but yes, it's possible.
-
December 2nd, 2005, 08:02 AM
#3
No reason why you couldn't.
As for changing ports, be sure to change the settings on both the sending *and* the receiving end. Otherwise things could get a little too interesting.
Note, port numbers below 1024 are reserved for specific uses, but above that is pretty much fair game--though it might be wise to choose something that's not used very often.
Got Root?
This user powered by Linux.
-
December 2nd, 2005, 10:08 AM
#4
Re: is it possible to route.....
Originally posted here by mrlucifer
Oh yeh can you change connecting ports for terminal services?
How to change Terminal Server's listening port
Oliver's Law:
Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|