Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Auditor vs. Backtrack

  1. February 24th, 2006, 12:38 PM #1
    hoss81
    hoss81 is offline
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    1

    Auditor vs. Backtrack

    Which one do you think is better, and why?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. February 24th, 2006, 01:25 PM #2
    SirDice
    SirDice is offline
    Just Another Geek
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Rotterdam, Netherlands
    Posts
    3,401
    Backtrack.. Simply because it's newer.. There won't be a new version of Auditor.. It got merged with Whax.. The development will continue on Backtrack..
    Oliver's Law:
    Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. February 24th, 2006, 02:26 PM #3
    J_K9
    J_K9 is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    548
    Originally posted here by SirDice
    Backtrack.. Simply because it's newer.. There won't be a new version of Auditor.. It got merged with Whax.. The development will continue on Backtrack..
    Exactly. The Auditor developers have stopped producing it, so Backtrack has taken a mixture of its and Whax's best features and squashed them together. So, I think you'll find that using an up-to-date toolkit is more preferable than using one which has older releases.

    Cheers,

    -jk
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. February 24th, 2006, 03:37 PM #4
    Irongeek
    Irongeek is offline
    King Tutorial-ankhamun
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    897
    Auditor seems a little bit more polished, but since they are nbo longer working on it I've switched to BackTrack. Remeber, BackTrack is still in beta so It should get better and have some more tools soon.
    http://www.irongeek.com
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules