Hi,

I was thinking about this last night. Let's say I host a few of my screenshots on Flickr. Now, those screenshots are 100% mine - but I'm hosting them on Flickr (copyright mine).

Let's say I put some of those screenshots (hosted on Flickr) into a tutorial, which I post online. I am not breaking any of the Flickr guidelines because the images are not titles or anything of the sort for a website, but rather images to be used to help ease the information across to the reader.

Then, I decide to post that tutorial here, images and all. However, JupM then claims copyright over my tutorial and all the images in it - which are being hosted on Flickr. My question is: isn't this an accidental and indirect violation of copyright, or is there a vital part of one of the two companies' TOS that I am missing?

Thanks,

-jk