dangers of limited account?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: dangers of limited account?

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    347

    dangers of limited account?

    hi ,
    and ty for your quick response as usual.
    Just interested is it any "danger"of surfing on limited account?
    can you be owned on it?
    what security risk is there if any if you use microsoft messenger,skype on limited account?
    I am just curious.
    I am conected tru router modem.
    thanks

  2. #2
    Just Another Geek
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Rotterdam, Netherlands
    Posts
    3,403
    Just interested is it any "danger"of surfing on limited account?
    The "dangers" are a lot less as opposed to doing it on an admin account.

    can you be owned on it?
    You can still run bad files. And if there's a way to leverage additional privileges you can still get "owned". So you still need to make sure your machine is up2date.

    what security risk is there if any if you use microsoft messenger,skype on limited account?
    The risks are the same but the "reach" of the malware is seriously limited.
    Oliver's Law:
    Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it.

  3. #3
    Howdy.

    There is a lot less of a chance of your system getting pwned while using the limited account, as the limited account has less user priveledges, ie you cannot install programs/ delete vital files etc..

    although it is still possible to get pwned, but you would need to be running the computer without a firewall or antivirus installed amongst a few other things.

    But other then that you have a less a chance of getting pwned then what you would if you were using the Administrator account for everyday use..

    kris.!

    <edit> Once again SirDice you beat me to it. </edit>

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    320
    There is always danger, but the question is how do you mitigate it. Surfing on a limited account is actually recommended since drive-by downloads and malware have a tougher time installing. Surfing w/ admin account, they can just download and install as administrator.

    Using Messenger and Skype on a limited account is just about the same thing. If an exploit comes out for one of them and you are running it as administrator, and you get attacked, you just got pwned (or whatever it is that you kids say nowadays) as where if it is on a limited accout, not as much damage can be done.

    /edit Jeez, SirDice and f2b beat me. guys are quick typers.
    The fool doth think he is wise, but the wiseman knows himself to be a fool - Good Ole Bill Shakespeare

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    347
    hi
    thnks litle bit more clear now.and btw like your coment about kids(or whatever it is that you kids say nowaday)
    i am 41 old kid
    ty once again

  6. #6
    Hoopy Frood
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    662
    Tip:
    Run your browser as a different restricted user than the one you work on. (i.e. if you work on user John, run your browser as user JohnBrowser) Make sure that JohnBrowser cannot execute any files and malware should be pretty well crippled. JohnBrowser should only be allowed to read/write from/to the necessary temporary internet files.

    - Xierox
    "Personality is only ripe when a man has made the truth his own."

    -- Sųren Kierkegaard

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    37
    The obvious question... What do you mean by 'limited account'

  8. #8
    They call me the Hunted foxyloxley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    3rd Rock from Sun
    Posts
    2,528
    windows has a couple of accounts 'built in'

    one is ADMINISTRATOR

    this one owns the PC, and can do just what it likes, as the PC will accept admin commands without question

    the other is 'limited'
    this one can surf and play, but should it decide it wants to load new apps to play with the PC will not allow it to because it is LIMITED in its ability to damage the system


    HTH
    55 - I'm fiftyfeckinfive and STILL no wiser,
    OLDER yes
    Beware of Geeks bearing GIF's
    come and waste the day :P at The Taz Zone

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    58
    This question has already been answered so I will only add two cents:

    For years I ignored all warnings about not to use your computer under Admin. I suffed the concequences when after examination it apeared some rootkit was installed. I have since taken these warnings more seriously, I run now as limited, and find I have to "run as" Admin to do alot of things, but the extra effort seems worth it.

    I have also stoped using IE based browsers and turned to Firefox. Running under Administrator using Internet Explorer was the worst mistake I ever made. It didnt mater what I used for antivirus, viruses and malware were still getting in.
    MyBox:

    Asus P5VDC-MX
    Celeron 2.8GHz
    512MB DDR 400
    WD 250GB SATA
    DVD-ROM, CD-RW
    Thermaltake 430W PSU
    Netgear WGT624 Router

  10. #10
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    18
    I would say though, that the term "limited account" in windows is horribly undescriptive. Can I install? Can I burn? Can I access this area? I much prefer the linux system of management where you can give users access to the wheel for absolute admin access and assign permissions for burners, etc on a needs-only basis.
    Cereal: Eaten at all times of the day.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •