-
September 15th, 2006, 06:14 PM
#1
Member
First CPU to use socket A?
Can someone please tell me what was the first AMD Athlon to use "Socket A"
Also is it correct to say that Athlon K7 was the competitor to Pentium 2 and used "Slot A"
The reason I ask for this information is I am gathering resources and images of various sockets and processors. So far ive been using google and wikopedia, but if anyone knows of any other historical hardware sites that would be apreciated.
MyBox:
Asus P5VDC-MX
Celeron 2.8GHz
512MB DDR 400
WD 250GB SATA
DVD-ROM, CD-RW
Thermaltake 430W PSU
Netgear WGT624 Router
-
September 15th, 2006, 11:48 PM
#2
but if anyone knows of any other historical hardware sites
I do believe that Nihil's 'store room' could well qualify under that term
also do you intend to 'use / distribute' said research
because I like reading 'historical' tales about IT
so now I'm in my SIXTIES FFS
WTAF, how did that happen, so no more alterations to the sig, it will remain as is now
Beware of Geeks bearing GIF's
come and waste the day :P at The Taz Zone
-
September 16th, 2006, 12:23 AM
#3
Member
Thanks, but where do I find Nihil's 'store room', I realize Nihil is a member but unaware of any store room of his, please bear in mind I dont visit antionline very often.
also do you intend to 'use / distribute' said research
because I like reading 'historical' tales about IT
Im sorry, the intent of my inquirey was part of my research in preperation for A+ certification, I am only familiarizeing myself with Sockets and Processors. I am actualy gathering pictures of such sockets and processors. I have on the other hand discovered this site:
www.cpu-collection.de
As well as www.old-computers.com which may be of interest to you.
MyBox:
Asus P5VDC-MX
Celeron 2.8GHz
512MB DDR 400
WD 250GB SATA
DVD-ROM, CD-RW
Thermaltake 430W PSU
Netgear WGT624 Router
-
September 16th, 2006, 05:02 AM
#4
-
September 16th, 2006, 05:56 AM
#5
i do believe socket 7 and socket A are the same socket... i have an older mobo from when DDR was first becomming popular.. the best processor it can run is an xp2000 athlon... but can also run K-7's
i JUST reccently moved from socket A to socket AM2... i had an xp3000 that did everything i needed it to do without fail. Socket A in my book has proved to be one of the best processor forms in my eyes. every intel ive had socket 478 has just been a hassel
work it harder, make it better, do it faster, makes us stronger
-
September 16th, 2006, 06:10 AM
#6
mirado~
I have just found the link to Eric's site:
http://www.pcbuyerbeware.co.uk/Sockets.htm
You should find pretty much everything you need to know here. Just remember to follow the links for more details. The site acts like a sort of index
This site is also useful. Here is an 86 page comparison of Intel and AMD:
http://tomshardware.co.uk/2005/11/21...charts_2005uk/
-
September 16th, 2006, 09:47 PM
#7
Member
Thanks Nihil ... Its funny I started thinking it might have been a joke. Thanks, especialy for the links, I found them very usefull and am still going through them. They are valueble resurces.
A Duron is rated at its chip speed whereas an Athlon is rated at its "performance value" or "equivalent to a Pentium"
Thanks for this important peice of information, Ill have to check into that.
It does apear that Cyrix is now owned by Via? I think that some of those mini ITX Mainboards and CPUs from Via are sleek, some very nice progrcts using them at http://www.mini-itx.com/
MyBox:
Asus P5VDC-MX
Celeron 2.8GHz
512MB DDR 400
WD 250GB SATA
DVD-ROM, CD-RW
Thermaltake 430W PSU
Netgear WGT624 Router
-
September 16th, 2006, 10:48 PM
#8
Hi mirado~ ,
I thought you might not know about those two UK sites
Cyrix merged with National Semiconductor, who eventually sold them to Via.
I actually have a Gateway 2000 with a Cyrix 386 processor and the old 30-pin RAM strips
It runs Windozzzzzzzzzze 95.................. but very slowly, as I am sure you can imagine.
I guess it must be quite rare as I don't think Cyrix made very many 386 class CPUs. Actually they didn't make them, they just designed them and had them fabricated.
Yes the Athlon XP+ range doesn't use the true clockspeed. This has an "Athlon XP 1900" which actually runs at about 1.6GHz.
It marginally loses to a 1.7GHz P4 of the same era on overall benchmark............... that is because it only has PC2100 memory and onboard video. The P4 has an AGP video card and RAMBUS PC800 memory.
Back then, the Athlon XP+ would beat the equivalent P4 and the Duron would slaughter a Celeron. I guess Intel momentarily lost the plot, particularly with their cache size/configuration?
I had a bit of fun one day because I had managed to "win" a machine with twin PIIIs in it ......... my colleagues were slightly amused that I had "a PIII box", when they were all getting P4s..............until I told them that there were two PIIIs................. and they were Xeons
The RAID1 SCSI array, $1500 video card, and 21" monitor also p1$$ed them off............ well if you look after the lads designing weapons of mass destruction, you expect them to look after you? and their cast-offs were better than anyone in IT dare hope for...........Actually, it did make a lot of sense as I needed a "reference machine" to test their upgrades, and there would be little point trying that on a standard IT issue box?
-
September 17th, 2006, 12:32 AM
#9
The Socket A was used by the Athlons.. Socket 7 was used by the Pentium 1's and AMD K6 chips
Pentium II used (predominently) Slot 1
There was a Slot A standard for a version of the Athlon/K7 never seen one so cant confirm.
the Athlons used true clock speed upto the 1GHz chips.. these are the pre Athlon XP chips.. Post XP (I cant remember the core names..but Palamino rings a bell) were benchmarked speeds.. the reference was the 1Ghz Athlon CPU..
The Duron and Athlon, the Duron was the Budget version of the Athlon, when these were released they were marketed against the Intel PIII, and the XP+'s were P4 killers
I do not recall the Durons being marketed with a different speed rating scheme to the Athlon.. the Duron dissappeared from the market not long after the XP+'s hit the shelves..
the Sempron eventually took the Durons place as the AMD - Celeron (or Budget CPU)
"Consumer technology now exceeds the average persons ability to comprehend how to use it..give up hope of them being able to understand how it works." - Me http://www.cybercrypt.co.nr
-
September 17th, 2006, 03:57 AM
#10
thourobread (mind the spelling) was the core name for my xp2000 and i knew someone that had a thunderbird(?)... it was a 1ghz athlon... wouldnt www.amd.com have a nice list of there cpu history?
work it harder, make it better, do it faster, makes us stronger
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|