running the perfect *nix distro 101
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: running the perfect *nix distro 101

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    5

    running the perfect *nix distro 101

    hello everyone

    i just got anonymous webrowsing to on my system

    ive got some noob questions about a router

    installing *nix i.e. (choosing distro)

    and which distro would be the best decision for semi noobs to learn how to write or cut n paste *nix scripts for setting up nvidia drivers for a geforce fx 5200 and successfully running steam with CS S , DoD S, WoW, BF2, random other new and upcoming opengl graphic intense PC games, but most of all i desire to run a good stable *nix distro for a DESKTOP not laptop with 512 / 1gb DDR amd 2800+ 2.1ghz asrock 462 mobo with SiS chipset and soundblaster live PCI card and DSL 1.5mb connected to a NIC 10/100 no router yet hardwired connection

    if anyone is bored and is good in this field feel free to msg me on synobite on aim

  2. #2
    Senior Member gore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    7,177
    http://antionline.com/showthread.php?t=251544

    It's a sticky. Also for hardware support SUSE is probably the best.

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    /
    Posts
    385

    Talking

    Quote Originally Posted by gore
    Also for hardware support SUSE is probably the best.
    Agreed with the SUSE option. Gore i'd watch out as you'll end up having the Ubuntu zeliot's coming after you, for not mentioning Ubuntu .

    cheers
    acidtone..

  4. #4
    Senior Member gore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    7,177
    That's OK, I'm used to it from the Gentoo boys Hehe. Nah though in all seriousness, if he tries out Ubuntu and it works right out of the box so to speak for him, then cool. I just think that for me, the hardware I've seen work the most was either SUSE or Slackware. They seem to work very well without messing with everything. Specially SUSE.

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    5
    thx alot for the help everyone im gonna give this old copy of suse 10 dvd a try , i might go and d/l ubuntu or beryl if i dont like this distro

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    10
    Yeah I dont want to be an ubuntu zealot but I suppose i have been won over. debian has a nice file structure it turns me on. but anyways, I am running kubuntu (cuz kde is my fav gui) and my geforce 6800 worked right out of the box as they say, and on a dual flat screen setup, you'll have to do some things by hand if your using a dual widescreen setup, but its fairly simple.
    i have better luck for hardware compatibility with suse for my server setups, especially setting up plesk or something like that, but for a client system its best to use k(ubuntu) edgy for the ease of use, and the apt packaging system is alot easier than yum and yast.

    well thats my 42 cents

  7. #7
    Senior Member gore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    7,177
    Quote Originally Posted by levi_501_dehaan
    Yeah I dont want to be an ubuntu zealot but I suppose i have been won over. debian has a nice file structure it turns me on. but anyways, I am running kubuntu (cuz kde is my fav gui) and my geforce 6800 worked right out of the box as they say, and on a dual flat screen setup, you'll have to do some things by hand if your using a dual widescreen setup, but its fairly simple.
    i have better luck for hardware compatibility with suse for my server setups, especially setting up plesk or something like that, but for a client system its best to use k(ubuntu) edgy for the ease of use, and the apt packaging system is alot easier than yum and yast.

    well thats my 42 cents
    It's easier to type commands than click on things in YAST? for who? And what is this file structure you speak of in Debian?

  8. #8
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    10
    there are several "click" programs in the Gui on K(Ubuntu) my favorite being the synaptic package manager.
    I would suggest checking out Debian/Ubuntu before making any spurious comments .

    and the file structure i mentioned is the file structure, different flavors of Linux have differing file structures, some are usually always the same, /var/www for example but in an overall picture of the file system there is a noticeable difference in the way things are structured and where files are placed.

    when i mentioned the file structure i was talking about command line, but what this user is curious about it seems to me, is the graphical interface, which is why i mentioned that the package managers are in my opinion, better and easier to navigate.

    as well as support for almost all packages you could want with automatic configuration on your system. and more options for repositories than you will ever need, and alien which lets you convert other package formats to the deb format.

    as well there is a large amount of support for the graphical user community, namely the nvidia chipsets and the support for multiple screens built in to the kernel modules.

    i have used every distro, and like i said suse is good for server installs, mostly because of the the disk support for the new scsi raid systems and what not, but for a single user who wants to use Linux for a desktop computing platform i feel Debian/Ubuntu takes the cake.

  9. #9
    Senior Member gore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    7,177
    I've been using Debian since 3.0 (And in Debian years, that's damn near stone age) and Ubuntu since about 5.0 or so, can't recall which as I don't look at the package it came in anymore.

    File structure as you're calling it isn't anything, Linux is Linux. The Kernel is still the same one Linus wrote unless you're using a customized one, and the shells and where things go don't really mean a thing.

    I'll stick with Slackware, same stability, actual new packages! And SUSE, just because I'm elitist like that.

  10. #10
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    10
    this could be a debate to last years, however lets agree to disagree on this subject and put it to rest, we both agree that linux in all its forms rocks socks. hopefully we answered synobite's questions or at least some of them concerning hardware compatibility.
    but kernels are all different, and disparate kernel modules can make the same releases different, on that one there is no argument.

Similar Threads

  1. suse is crap on finding cdrom
    By rajunpl in forum Operating Systems
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: July 1st, 2004, 08:30 AM
  2. running webserver
    By soia in forum Microsoft Security Discussions
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: September 23rd, 2003, 08:09 AM
  3. creating linux distro
    By Kezil in forum AntiOnline's General Chit Chat
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: June 25th, 2003, 09:28 AM
  4. Running Your Firewall in runlevel 0
    By micael in forum *nix Security Discussions
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: February 19th, 2002, 04:13 PM
  5. Traceroute: under the hood
    By antihaxor in forum Non-Security Archives
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: January 24th, 2002, 05:42 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •