-
December 20th, 2007, 05:47 PM
#16
that was probably some bs written up by someone who didn't know a whole lot about what he was looking at. there would be no need to include an encrypted password in the url. once authenticated all you need is a session id, which is what it probably was.
as far as GPF's problem, no that's not what i meant by activity. I mean someone with a completely different writing style is actively using it as of that date. So, I guess the question to solve the mystery here is: who were you attached to, when, where and how did you get there (who took you)? Fobbie? Please answer all in detail. Otherwise, leave other people's accounts alone...
Similar Threads
-
By Und3ertak3r in forum AntiOnline's General Chit Chat
Replies: 1
Last Post: November 19th, 2004, 10:16 PM
-
By LilDraganon in forum AntiOnline's General Chit Chat
Replies: 11
Last Post: November 17th, 2002, 06:14 PM
-
By ac1dsp3ctrum in forum AntiOnline's General Chit Chat
Replies: 28
Last Post: March 25th, 2002, 03:31 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|