6 Botnets = 85% of Spam
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: 6 Botnets = 85% of Spam

  1. #1
    Senior Member phernandez's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    246

    6 Botnets = 85% of Spam

    Six botnets churning out 85 percent of all spam - Ars Technica

    Been interested in botnets since Storm (and it's sneaky ways) came on the scene. But things have changed a lot since those days...

    Srizbi is not alone in the post-Storm botnet world. Marshal estimates that six botnets account for 85 percent of the total spam sent world-wide. Srizbi is currently in the lead, with 39 percent of the "market," followed by Rustock at 20 percent, Mega-D at 11 percent, Hacktool.Spammer at seven percent, Pushdo (6 percent), and Storm (two percent).
    Poor Storm

  2. #2
    Only african to own a PC! Cider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Israel
    Posts
    1,683
    WOW. Only 6.

    I must still do some research on botnets.
    The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it.
    Albert Einstein

  3. #3
    Senior Member nihil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    United Kingdom: Bridlington
    Posts
    17,190
    I wonder if the demise of Storm is due to its architecture?

    In the old days you would kill a botnet by taking down the command centre(s). I keep reading that the latest ones have some kind of cellular, peer-to-peer, onion ring like structure? This means that there is no central point to attack them at

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    33
    Ever played whack-a-mole?

    I recall reading somewhere where someone was comparing taking down parts of botnets to playing whack-a-mole. Take down one control node and another one pops up in its place. From using peer-to-peer networks, to encryption, to DNS control lists; taking down any of these botnets is a long, tedious, non-rewarding experience. Tracking them is much easier. No outside intervention is going to be enough to destroy them. It needs to happen from the inside. Someone needs to gain control with the main credentials--can't do that from the outside.


    For those of you who continue to try to take them down from the outside, I have one question.


    Wanna play whack-a-mole?

  5. #5
    Senior Member nihil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    United Kingdom: Bridlington
    Posts
    17,190
    Yes,

    It is rather like conventional military operations and insurgency. Conventional military methods have very limited effectiveness against insurgents because they lack a discrete infrastructure to target.

    Botnets have gone "distributed processing" as well

  6. #6
    Senior Member JPnyc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    2,734
    This refers to e-mail spam bots, but right now 90% of forum spam is being done by one bot. One of Russian origin.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: April 10th, 2006, 08:27 PM
  2. A little about adware/spyware and Spam - just for you StopSpam
    By valhallen in forum The Security Tutorials Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: September 30th, 2004, 04:45 PM
  3. Spam problem
    By FamStars&Straps in forum Miscellaneous Security Discussions
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: October 12th, 2003, 06:33 AM
  4. Dealing With Unsolicited Email (Spam)
    By steve.milner in forum The Security Tutorials Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: August 20th, 2003, 06:51 AM
  5. Build a spam firewall with Linux
    By problemchild in forum The Security Tutorials Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: April 3rd, 2003, 12:11 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •