-
August 25th, 2008, 04:43 AM
#11
Junior Member
But enabling permanent ssl would make uploading/downloading large attachments much slower, also if this vulnerability is in gmail wouldn't it be in many other sites as well? Why does Perry specifically target gmail. I'm just trying to get a better understanding of this.
Last edited by ninjafish; August 25th, 2008 at 04:47 AM.
-
August 25th, 2008, 07:44 AM
#12
t3abag - If I set up gmail through outlook I would obviously need INternational bandwidth , it wouldnt work through a local only account ?
Jsut checking :P
The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it.
Albert Einstein
-
August 25th, 2008, 01:20 PM
#13
That is correct ninjafish, it would use more bandwith butI wouldnt worry about that too much, its just emails and most of the payload is on the server :-P
-
August 26th, 2008, 02:16 AM
#14
Hi ninjafish,
also if this vulnerability is in gmail wouldn't it be in many other sites as well? Why does Perry specifically target gmail. I'm just trying to get a better understanding of this.
Yes it does affect others.......... please look at my post #8 in this thread.
I don't think that Perry is being critical as such, given that Google seem to be the only ones addressing this problem at the moment?
Similar Threads
-
By ThePreacher in forum Miscellaneous Security Discussions
Replies: 17
Last Post: December 14th, 2006, 09:37 PM
-
By 3rr0r in forum The Security Tutorials Forum
Replies: 26
Last Post: December 1st, 2004, 06:31 AM
-
By jehnx in forum AntiOnline's General Chit Chat
Replies: 85
Last Post: October 30th, 2004, 07:04 AM
-
By ss2chef in forum AntiOnline's General Chit Chat
Replies: 23
Last Post: September 6th, 2004, 11:19 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|